Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin: Cannibals in GOP Establishment Employ Tactics of the Left
Sarah Palin's Facebook Page ^ | January 27, 2012 | Sarah Palin

Posted on 01/27/2012 3:18:48 PM PST by Timber Rattler

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 481-500 next last
To: Cringing Negativism Network

>> “Get off the sidelines Palin.” <<

.
This crap is exactly why she’s on the side. There is no way she could have raised enough dough to fight the RNC mob.


61 posted on 01/27/2012 4:13:16 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

RE: Cannibals in GOP Establishment Employ Tactics of the Left

Anybody with half a brain can see their boy Romney is a leftist, so what would you expect?


62 posted on 01/27/2012 4:13:57 PM PST by big'ol_freeper ("Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" ~ Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Go Tea Party..Go Sarah...GO Newt


63 posted on 01/27/2012 4:17:13 PM PST by MEG33 (Keep Free Republic Going...DONATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Semper911; All
But it not very conservative of Newt to hold Mitt's financial successes against him.

Give me a break. Mitt makes it an issue by claiming his Bain Capital work makes him the best candidate for president because he knows how the real economy works. The activity at Bain must be vetted now. How do you expect that to happen or do you want to walk into an October Surprise over Bain's vulture capitalism (and ties to $100m in Medicare fraud) because Newt, the leading anti-Romney, left it alone because capitalism is a sacred cow and Romney's word is good?

Further, did you miss the ABC News piece posted here earlier today that Mitt's "blind trusts" dealing with Swiss and Cayman Island accounts aren't really blind because they're run by his great good friend and personal lawyer, something that will violate federal law should he take office?

Criticism of Romey's claimed chief bona fides for is not "class warfare" except to Romney defenders and those thin skinned about whether ethics should be applied to capitalist pursuits.

64 posted on 01/27/2012 4:17:44 PM PST by newzjunkey (a FL win returns Romney to the "inevitability" path.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Deb

It appears Rush thought he might be losing HIS base.

It also appears Palin just dumped on McCain. Finally!


65 posted on 01/27/2012 4:17:48 PM PST by Terry Mross (We need a second party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer

Amen..BUMP!


66 posted on 01/27/2012 4:18:04 PM PST by MEG33 (Keep Free Republic Going...DONATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Deb

The problem is that yesterday was important, today was not, Rush did what he had to do yesterday to stop Newt, now he is back to being our buddy.

Yesterday was a day of shame and coming out for conservative pretenders, people who used to be thought of as members of the conservative movement.

Rush, Drudge, Tyrell, and others will never be trusted again by conservatives as they go the way of David Frum and Ann Coulter.

We have learned that beyond the establishment battle lines that we knew of, there was a deeper layer among us, a fire wall, Rush Limbaugh and Drudge had to expose themselves to keep Newt from taking Florida, which probably would have broken the Romney campaign.

Already today, now that the debate is over, the rescuing body blow already delivered, Rush is pretending to be back among us, as though yesterday and the previous weeks and months, and the five years of supporting Romney, never happened.


67 posted on 01/27/2012 4:18:22 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Americanexpat

****You know I think the reason the establishment GOP hates Newt is because if elected he will make them earn their pay. :>)****

That has to be the reason the Pubbies in the House threw him under the bus in 1998 - he made them work every day on real reforms - not letting them just ‘pork’ around and they resisted and resented it. They love being in the minority - less responsibility.

New slogan WORK NOT PORK !!!!!


68 posted on 01/27/2012 4:19:10 PM PST by sodpoodle ( Newt - God has tested him for a reason...... to celebrate life and embrace the future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

She’s not prohibited from doing anything, but run herself if she’s on the air. She’s paid to give her opinion and commentary, but she won’t endorse because she respects Reagan’s 11th commandment. That used to be the norm for politicians, to not take sides in the primary.


69 posted on 01/27/2012 4:19:35 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Semper911

Didn’t Sarah just write that newt is an ‘imperfect vessel for the Tea Party’?


70 posted on 01/27/2012 4:20:55 PM PST by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot
My thoughts exactly.

Whether she thought it would be a good thing or a bad thing for Newt, hard to tell in the end.

If she did see this coming, she should have gone ahead and endorsed Newt in order to get ahead of it, not talked about how she would vote for Newt in SC simply to "keep it going."

I realize she's hoping that by "keeping it going," Mittens will be exposed somehow. As she wrote:

Now, I respect Governor Romney and his success. But there are serious concerns about his record and whether as a politician he consistently applied conservative principles and how this impacts the agenda moving forward. The questions need answers now. That is why this primary should not be rushed to an end. We need to vet this.

But the practical question is HOW to get these answers and/or how to get anyone to care.

The fact is that Romney has been running for years, and has gone through the process just like all the other candidates, including those who got bounced, and HE'S STILL STANDING.

That's the reality we're facing.

Yes, more time will lead to more scrutiny, and that may -- finally -- do the trick. But, as seen with Gingrich, not necessarily.

There are many who have decided they are okay with any and everything that Gingrich has stumbled over over the last decades -- and, in my view, few people who have reached that conclusion will change their mind. Even if they become re-disenchanted with Gingrich, they will hold their nose and vote for him.

The reality, however, is that there is a similar contingent that supports Romney! They know the same types of things about him that Gingrich supporters know about Gingrich -- and they are okay with it. They are willing to overlook these things, for whatever reason, and, again, in my view, very few who have reached that conclusion will change their mind.

And the state of debate is such that any and all vetting that is done of the candidates -- regardless of which one -- is SIMPLY and IMMEDIATELY DISMISSED by anyone supporting that candidate. It's all immediately branded as "lies," a conspiracy, a power play, the other side "trying to tell us who to vote for" -- and on and on. Yes, this happens in the camp of EVERY candidate at this point. This means that even legitimate, factually accurate knocks on a candidate get dismissed and ignored. This applies to Romney the same as everyone else.

See the impasse here?

It's truly hard to see a path forward that vets Romney in such a way as to dislodge his support from those who have already decided to overlook certain things. For Pete's sake, conservatives have been trying for years now to make something stick to him.

If Palin or anyone else can figure out how to further vet Romney in a way that works -- all the way to God's ears!

71 posted on 01/27/2012 4:22:27 PM PST by fightinJAG (So many seem to have lost their sense of smell . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I know I’ll never vote for Romney.


72 posted on 01/27/2012 4:22:48 PM PST by KansasGirl (Romney to Santorum: Obamneycare "nothing to get angry about".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: All
Palin is 100% correct. If FL goes to Romney, he will have failed to get the vetting necessary to survive a fall campaign.

The only chance to stop the short circuit of the primary process is a win for Newt in FL. If you're seriously for Santorum, he won't have any opportunity to make his case should Newt fail if FL goes Romney.

The next month is naturally Romney-friendly with almost no debates, Mormon-heavy Nevada and Mitt's birth state of Michigan, where his dad was governor, deciding delegates.

A FL win for Romney will deflate the potential competitiveness of March 6th's Super Tuesday.

If you plan to donate, now is the time. Keep this process alive!

73 posted on 01/27/2012 4:23:47 PM PST by newzjunkey (a FL win returns Romney to the "inevitability" path.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

That’s absurd. What a ridiculous post. Everyone’s wrong sometime, but Rush is the greatest friend conservatism has or will ever have in the media.


74 posted on 01/27/2012 4:23:55 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Rush has been one of the greatest forces for conservatism, but when push comes to shove, we learn that he is a Romney type man.

These last few years many of us are starting to realize why conservatism keeps having so many near misses, so many almosts, decade after decade, after decade, after decade, after decade, after decade.

It isn’t just near misses, we have all seen when one of our sure victories suddenly dies a mysterious death, and we are left scratching our heads about how it died when we controlled everything.


75 posted on 01/27/2012 4:24:00 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

A little o/t, but, boy, do I love football analogies! Thanks.


76 posted on 01/27/2012 4:25:20 PM PST by fightinJAG (So many seem to have lost their sense of smell . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Already today, now that the debate is over, the rescuing body blow already delivered, Rush is pretending to be back among us, as though yesterday and the previous weeks and months, and the five years of supporting Romney, never happened.

Two words...Clear Channel.

77 posted on 01/27/2012 4:26:09 PM PST by greyfoxx39 (Romney seems like a creature put on Earth to blend in with the humans and report back what he finds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

***Rush is pretending to be back among us****

Dead man walking;)

Free at last!!!!!!!!!.


78 posted on 01/27/2012 4:26:40 PM PST by sodpoodle ( Newt - God has tested him for a reason...... to celebrate life and embrace the future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

Comment #79 Removed by Moderator

To: ansel12

You must not have listened to him today...Rush ripped a few new ...


80 posted on 01/27/2012 4:27:27 PM PST by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 481-500 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson