Posted on 01/27/2012 3:28:30 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee
Please, tell us what you believe IS “good enough”?
Implement reliable statistical process (quality) controls in order to reduce gross error by 50% within ten years.
Just what is it you would like these process controls applied to?
Earthquake predictions?
Nuclear Power Plant construction?
Power Plant site locations?
Power Plant facilities construction?
Power Plant operating processes?
BTTT!
Processes by which various authorities continuously and predictably err on the side of caution when issuing warnings, alerts and mandatory evacuations prior to and during weather-related events and naturally occurring disasters.
Since we’re not talking about run-of-the-mill widgets here, I may be barking up the wrong tree. I’m not a part of either community (authoritative or scientific), so for all I know measurements of their successes and failures are becoming ever more accurate and precise and will continue to improve. However, it sure doesn’t look that way to me.
Thanks neverdem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.