Skip to comments.
Obama: Millionaires Should Pay At Least 30 Percent in Taxes [No Deductions: Households Over $250k]
MSNBC ^
| January 24, 2012
| Michael O'Brien
Posted on 01/24/2012 9:27:43 PM PST by Steelfish
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
1
posted on
01/24/2012 9:27:45 PM PST
by
Steelfish
To: Steelfish
And there goes the final nail in the coffin for the economy.
2
posted on
01/24/2012 9:33:08 PM PST
by
comebacknewt
(Newt (sigh) what could have been . . .)
To: Steelfish
Man oh man, I’m so glad I didn’t watch this.
Of course the only way I would have watched is if somebody hog-tied me and put me in front of a tv with my eyes taped open—LOL!
3
posted on
01/24/2012 9:34:15 PM PST
by
basil
(It's time to rid the country of "gun free zones" aka "Killing Fields")
To: Steelfish
hussein, you dumb-***, you just don’t get it. Americans shouldn’t pay more, the government should spend less. Far less.
4
posted on
01/24/2012 9:35:32 PM PST
by
ThunderSleeps
(Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
To: Steelfish
Shouldn't the patriotic billionaire just donate that much to the government?
Could they perhaps believe that they could better help others than the government?
Do they think that government just squanders money?
If Buffett is making policy, shouldn't we see his tax records?
5
posted on
01/24/2012 9:38:28 PM PST
by
mckenzie7
(Democrats = Trough Sloppers!)
To: Steelfish
Nobody that makes a million dollars this year has any guarantee they will make that much next year. I reject the premise that we have to base what we pay the government on a12 month cycle. Too arbitrary.
6
posted on
01/24/2012 9:40:48 PM PST
by
isthisnickcool
(Sharia? No thanks!)
To: Steelfish
This will make NY, Silicon Valley and Stinky Francisco libs very happy.
To: Steelfish
So if this became law, over the next ten years tax revenues from this tax would pay for less than two months of Social Security.
I think.
It’s a guess until tomorrow when I can pull up the stats.
To: Steelfish
"You can call this class warfare all you want," Obama said. "But asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes? Most Americans would call that common sense."The better route would be to give the secretary a tax cut so that her effective tax rate would be no higher than that of her boss. Let's not punish the rich, but instead we should reward people by allowing them to keep more of the fruits of their labor.
Of course this would require a dramatic cut in Federal Spending.
9
posted on
01/24/2012 9:43:38 PM PST
by
P-Marlowe
(NEWT!!! Because everyone else is just average.)
To: Steelfish
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes,
10
posted on
01/24/2012 9:44:17 PM PST
by
bunkerhill7
(Congress in the WH ?? Who knew?)
To: Steelfish
The kind of idiots that will vote for him eat this crap up.
They are as oblivious to reality as Obama.
To: Steelfish
Unless that secretary is making over $178,000 a year and has zero deductions...she ain’t paying 30%.
To: Steelfish
I thought he said everybody should play by the same rules.
If so, then everyone pays the same tax rate.
No discrimination allowed. Everyone gets treated the same as everyone else. No special privilege.
One group doesn't get singled out to pay more so another group pays nothing. Everyone pays the same rate.
If you make more, you pay more. If you make less, you pay less. One rate fits all.
13
posted on
01/24/2012 9:48:35 PM PST
by
GBA
(Natural Born American)
To: Steelfish
By the time Obama gets done that million will buy you a Snickers Bar (and we’ll all be “millionaires”).
14
posted on
01/24/2012 9:51:26 PM PST
by
The Duke
To: mckenzie7
I think every millionaire in this country would be very, very wise to invest 30% of their income this year in defeating Obama. They will never get a better return on an investment.
15
posted on
01/24/2012 9:57:28 PM PST
by
Mad_as_heck
(The MSM - America's (domestic) public enemy #1.)
To: Steelfish
I’m confused. Isn’t a one million dollar a year income, adjusted tax income, already pay over 30% in federal income taxes?
16
posted on
01/24/2012 10:05:06 PM PST
by
Fledermaus
(I can't fiddle so I'll just open a cold beer as I watch America burn.)
To: Steelfish
that is effing crazy!
Rush will shite tomorrow...I hope Newt hater Steyn ain't back again
17
posted on
01/24/2012 10:08:58 PM PST
by
wardaddy
(I am a social conservative. My political party left me(again). They can go to hell in a bucket.)
To: Steelfish
Obama doesn't seem to realize that people will find ways to avoid the 30%, and if they don't, they will have less money for discretionary spending on luxuries like investments in companies and charitable giving ...
18
posted on
01/24/2012 10:12:32 PM PST
by
Lmo56
(If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
To: Steelfish
Obama math - $250,000 = $1,000,000,000
Works for me...
19
posted on
01/24/2012 10:17:53 PM PST
by
Kickass Conservative
(Liberals, Useful Idiots Voting for Useless Idiots...)
To: Steelfish
OK...let’s do a little math....say, some millionaire pays 15% tax...that’s $150,000....soooo...the other 15% (that Obomba wants them to pay) equals TWO $75,000 per year salaries....what an idiot!
20
posted on
01/24/2012 10:19:01 PM PST
by
goodnesswins
(2012..."We mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our Sacred Honor")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson