Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Never has a winner looked so beaten (Mitt)
New York Post ^ | January 11, 2012 | John Podhoretz

Posted on 01/11/2012 7:10:01 AM PST by greyfoxx39

Edited on 01/11/2012 7:15:18 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: svcw
I will not vote for Paul, Romney or Huntsman if any where to win the nomination - Period!! I will vote all other offices, just not president.

I'll write in "Tim Tebow" (so he isn't 35 yet.)

41 posted on 01/11/2012 8:13:39 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

You wrote: “WHAT “serious” candates? Palin is the only one I can think of.”

Not for nothing did she say this:

Jan 3, 2012

Palin: “GOP better not marginalize Ron Paul and his supporters”

VIDEO: http://www.therightscoop.com/palin-gop-better-not-marginalize-ron-paul-and-his-supporters/


42 posted on 01/11/2012 8:19:15 AM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I'll write in "Tim Tebow" (so he isn't 35 yet.)

No matter. There's no proof that Obama is 35 either.

43 posted on 01/11/2012 8:20:08 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (Let's not vet Mitt w/Bain so Obama can do it all summer. /sarc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

bttt


44 posted on 01/11/2012 8:24:10 AM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

Sorry. I don’t get the point of your post @42.


45 posted on 01/11/2012 8:27:58 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (Let's not vet Mitt w/Bain so Obama can do it all summer. /sarc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
Gingrich is clearly the anti-establishment candidate.

Fixed it.

However, it's still true that Noot > Romney.

46 posted on 01/11/2012 8:28:58 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Why, yes. I AM in a bad mood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

Willard seems to think he is entitled to his CAMELOT, but he is more like Al Gore, who also thought he had entitlements.


47 posted on 01/11/2012 8:31:06 AM PST by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

viable, credible, feasible, possible


48 posted on 01/11/2012 8:38:13 AM PST by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, and many others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

“Santorum is a serious candidate.
No real conservative would doubt this.”

My observation is that although Mr. Santorum takes himself seriously, and although those on the right take him seriously as well, he lacks the “electoral horsepower” to win on the national stage.

By contrast, Mr. Romney has at least a _little_ more of that “horsepower” than does Mr. Santorum, but nobody takes him seriously... :)


49 posted on 01/11/2012 8:41:22 AM PST by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

With that criteria I would say that Santorum is not yet a serious candidate. He doesn’t have the funds raised or the organization in place to run in all the States needed on Super Tuesday.

And everyday the road gets longer and harder without the funds in hand and the people in place.

South Carolina is a make or break election. If Romney (or Paul) wins, the game is over. Money dries up from the other candidates and it’s trying to put lipstick on our pig to beat the lipsticked pig the Democrats are stuck with.

If someone else wins, all the money from the “Not-Mitt” movement shifts to them. Then we have a race to the nomination. If Santorum wins South Carolina, he will become a serious candidate, but he just isn’t one yet.


50 posted on 01/11/2012 8:43:21 AM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Mary
I think many Conservatives will hold their nose and vote for Mitt if he is the candidate.

Photobucket

I won't vote for Romney.

51 posted on 01/11/2012 8:44:03 AM PST by dragonblustar (Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar

Ditto...no Romney, no way.


52 posted on 01/11/2012 8:46:33 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: All
"Romney also noted, “There are people who want to elect a commander in chief. They’re not worried about electing a pastor in chief. That’s not what I’m running for.”

Mitt Romney: South Carolina not concerned about electing ‘pastor-in-chief’

Mitt: "In your Face, Evangelicals, Christians"!

god in embryo

53 posted on 01/11/2012 8:54:45 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (Let's not vet Mitt w/Bain so Obama can do it all summer. /sarc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg

It’s hard trying to figure out what’s going on with Gingrich. Strong establishment streak in him, true. But the current establishment has gone all out against him. If this is a sincere effort on their part, it means they fear him and therefore he is likely a good choice for our country.

If nothing else, Gingrich might have the creative intelligence and maybe even the cojones to do something radical like reestablishing the legal and political authority of our Constitution.


54 posted on 01/11/2012 8:57:23 AM PST by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, and many others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
"Sorry. I don’t get the point of your post @42."

Just this, "Not for nothing" did she say that. :)

55 posted on 01/11/2012 8:59:09 AM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
Paul will certainly stay in it with Romney all the way. Somebody has to. And that is not good news for the Republican Party, which will have to reckon with possibly ill-behaved Paul delegates at the convention in Tampa in August — delegates who might heckle Romney from the floor and otherwise disrupt his coronation.

Sorry, my give-a-damn's busted. I'm no Paul fan, but if the party and MSM succeeds in shoving Romney down our throats like, it looks like they're on the verge of doing, I really couldn't care less if Romney gets heckled and has his coronation disrupted. I'll just grab my popcorn and enjoy the show...

56 posted on 01/11/2012 9:00:07 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

Fine. So he’s a potentially serious candidate. The way I see things, this is the same as being a serious candidate.


57 posted on 01/11/2012 9:00:21 AM PST by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, and many others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
"This table lists the top donors to this candidate in the 2012 election cycle. The organizations themselves did not donate, rather the money came from the organizations' PACs, their individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals' immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates."

Open Secrets.org

Romney Contributors

Goldman Sachs
$367,200
Credit Suisse Group $203,750
Morgan Stanley $199,800
HIG Capital $186,500
Barclays $157,750
Kirkland & Ellis $132,100
Bank of America $126,500
PriceWaterhouseCoopers $118,250
EMC Corp $117,300
JPMorgan Chase & Co $112,250
The Villages $97,500
Vivint Inc $80,750
Marriott International $79,837
Sullivan & Cromwell $79,250
Bain Capital $74,500
UBS AG $73,750
Wells Fargo $61,500
Blackstone Group $59,800
Citigroup Inc $57,050
Bain & Co $52,500

58 posted on 01/11/2012 9:22:49 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (Let's not vet Mitt w/Bain so Obama can do it all summer. /sarc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: svcw
I will not vote for Paul, Romney or Huntsman if any where to win the nomination - Period!! I will vote all other offices, just not president.

That's been my position as well. I might have held my nose and voted for McCain but Romney is a bridge way too far.

If I'm accused of electing Obama by my actions, so be it. I think that Obama with a hostile Congress would do less damage to our nation than Romney with a compliant Congress. Even a strongly-conservative Congress would have difficulty contending seriously with a President of their own party. Besides, the Republican establishment needs to hear us once and for all: NO MORE RINOS.

59 posted on 01/11/2012 9:37:34 AM PST by CommerceComet (Governor Romney, why would any conservative vote for the author of the beta version of ObamaCare?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight
DING DING DING...!!!!

WINNER, WINNER...CHICKEN DINNER!!!

WE HAVE A WINNER!!!

60 posted on 01/11/2012 9:41:50 AM PST by Osage Orange (HE HATE ME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson