Posted on 01/10/2012 11:30:42 AM PST by americanophile
Author is a doofus misrepresenting the arguments.
Capitalism is good but ECONOMIC FREEDOM is better.
Well, I heard Newt say on TV that Bain bought a company, plundered it of $180 million then let it go bankrupt. That might have been perfectly legal. If it’s true, what is the problem with pointing it out?
After 8 years of Obama and his media conservatism will be refined so much that Olympia Snowe will be "too far to the right" to ever be elected President.
Rombot,
So why should American taxpayers have to be forced to pay for Willard’s business incompetence and greed?
—
Workers were denied the severance pay and health insurance they’d been promised, and their pension benefits were cut..
What’s more, a federal government insurance agency had to pony up $44 million to bail out the company’s underfunded pension plan. Nevertheless, Bain profited on the deal, receiving $12 million on its $8 million initial investment and at least $4.5 million in consulting fees.
http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/01/bain-drip-drip-drip/
Oh, well I’m sure the left will clear it up for everyone.
Economic freedom is capitalism. Those who are against capitalism are against freedom.
Ok here is what is going on. As hard as it is to believe.. there are liberal Republicans... and they appear to be about 20% of us.. and they support Romney.
Thus if we want to cut into Romney’s support.. Romney has to be attacked from the left. Thus the Bain attacks.
An attack from the right wont work on Romney, because no one on the right supports him.
Guess I'll catch it in the Obama ads this Fall - no matter who the GOP candidate is. Lucy held that football and gosh darnit all we're gonna really kick it down field this time...
The problem is that government has gotten itself way too involved in capitalism.
We need separation of Capital and State.
Here is my theory:
Newt knows he isn’t winning NH. He is attacking from the left to run interference for Huntsman, who is in the running for 2nd (and it appears to be working looking at today’s polls). If Huntsman gets some momentum coming out of NH, and can possibly pull 10% in SC, coming from Romney’s base, he can survive the inevitable split in the conservative vote and win in SC.
Agreed.
I’m not Rush so I can’t say “Don’t doubt me!” - but I will bet that this anti-Bain argument ends up doing no more for those who pursue it than the “1%” argument did for the Occupy Wall St. protesters.
Amen to that. And when they start yammering about finding a right to privacy in the Constitution, how about a right to privacy when it comes to our finances and medical care?
No what’s going on here is that we’re cutting our ideological legs out from under us as a party in the effort to derail Romney. This is much bigger, more dangerous and consequential than Romney’s political fate; this undercutting of capitalism and embrace of socialistic populism will haunt us.
“Workers were denied the severance pay and health insurance they’d been promised, and their pension benefits were cut..
What’s more, a federal government insurance agency had to pony up $44 million to bail out the company’s underfunded pension plan. Nevertheless, Bain profited on the deal, receiving $12 million on its $8 million initial investment and at least $4.5 million in consulting fees.”
Was it legal?
I dare say, most here at FR would support making money as long as it’s legal.
They’re all so clever.... OR, they’re just grabbing at straws as they approach the waterfalls.
I think that this is a tempest in a teapot. This is nothing more that payback to Romney for being a sh*t-head. That’s all!
Have no fear, the democrats will be using the arguments and our own guys against us in the fall.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.