Time for your nap.
Posted on 01/10/2012 3:02:31 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
You came on this thread to advise people. I have tried to understand you and where you have been in this primary. If you consider that "crap" I can't help that.
Unlike you, I am not an operative for a given campaign. So stuff it. Your methods are as blatant as they are slimy. You will promote Perry past the point of viability to where he endangers the ability to find a viable anti-Romney - and THAT is what I am about. And you have shown you will use junk from anywhere to further your agenda and attack anyone not named Perry.
In this case, Romney is no John McCain, and that’s really saying something about Mitt Romney. There’s no way he will match McCain’s 2008 performance in SC. In my opinion Romney will have a difficult time exceeding his own 2008 performance - 15.3%. That leaves a lot of room for two and probably three others to exceed his vote total.
I support and defend Gov. Rick Perry vigorously, just as I did Sarah Palin (for years). Here is one of my Palin vanity posts close to the time I was reading about a possible Perry run. The Lamestream Media Didn’t Warn Us: “Barack Obama is Coming!”
You seem to find it impossible to stay civil.
"Junk?"
What "junk?"
You seem to find it impossible to stay civil.
Ah, again, that's rich. You bald-faced lied about me yesterday about being a vicious anti-Perry poster. Today you play your impugning of motives gambit. And then try to play the civility card. Just like the Dems do after a round of attacking Republicans.
Like I said, you're a slimeball. But that's what happens when someone is in campaign operative mode. They just shovel the sh** while calling it candy.
Oh, like your use of that Dem attack against Santorum from 2006 the other day. That's just what comes to mind off the top of my head. But you had no problem also using MSM attacks against the other candidates.
Conservatives stick to points of discussion from a conservative point of view. Hacks fling mud no matter where it comes from. Guess what that makes you?
Your behavior speaks for itself, as does mine.
Go fight someone else.
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:cincinatuswife/index?tab=articles
My tread posts are an open book.
In both cases, YOU provoked a fight. Today, you impugned my motives. Yesterday, you, out of nowhere, falsely claimed I was the most vicious anti-Perry poster on FR.
So don't now say to go fight somewhere else - instead, stop attacking other posters with your dishonest methods.
The tread speaks for itself.
Your antics speak for you - poorly. You flat-out lied about me yesterday, completely unprovoked. And today you pull your usual nonsense of trying to impugn the motives of other posters.
If I flat out lied about you put the link.
FReeper "dirtboy" you have been the most vicious anti-Perry poster on FR
Most vicious anti-Perry poster? I have been anti-YOU and your slimebot campaign hack ways. Not anti-Perry. I guess you can't tell the difference. Doesn't make it less of a lie. I have concerns about all three remaining anti-Romneys but could support any of the three. But any willingness of mine I have to support Perry sure as heck didn't come from anything you have done on FR. To the contrary, it's a testament to Perry that I would even still consider him after the antics of you and the worst of the Perry brigade.
I have given you a cup of cocoa and a pillow several times in posts in the past, as you seemed so irate all the time.
If you don’t like my advocacy for Rick Perry I can not help you there.
But since you have mainly gone after me (and in a very personal manner) I will retract and apologize for calling you “the most vicious ant-Perry poster on FR.”
Please accept my apology.
Thank you for the LINK!
That's funny, CW. In the thread in question, I was having a polite discussion and you showed up to impugn my motives and sent the thread spiralling downhill. Likewise here. And then you turn around and lecture ME about civility? You don't need cocoa, you need to stop your projection. You project the fact that you have ulterior motives onto others. I have none. I just want to make sure we don't hand the primary election to Mitt. Never have claimed otherwise.
If you don’t like my advocacy for Rick Perry I can not help you there.
Once again, it isn't about your candidate, just the way you have gone about it. Have I gotten after you for the last week or so unless you tied into me first? No. Because you quit bashing the other candidates, other than the occasional retort. I don't have a problem with your promotion of Perry and instead use your threads to read up on what he is doing. Hopefully he can get his campaign functioning, that seems to be the main thing holding him back.
And once again, you make it personal about other FReepers as well when you impugn their motives - not just me. So once again, don't lecture others about civility unless you are willing to examine your own incivility.
Apology accepted regarding the vicious comment. Now, if you could just not impugn others, continue to not bash the other anti-Romney candidates (because we're all gonna have to support ONE of them eventually) and promote Perry unless he leaves the race, I won't have an issue with you.
Go jump in a lake.
I’ve wasted all the time on you that I care to.
OK, Miss Civility. Thanks for making my point for me.
Plus, I doubt you could give up impugning motives, it's too deeply ingrained into your Perry promoting methods.
Time for your nap.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.