Posted on 01/03/2012 1:31:39 PM PST by Kaslin
Palin sticks with only the lowest risk that provides the greatest gain, to either her fame or her fortune, or both.
Endorsing anyone who doesn’t already have the sun shining on them and the wind at their back is quite out of the question, for her endorsement. As you said, “if Palin were going to save Perry, she would have done it by now.” Too much risk there for brave Sarah.
Same with McCain. A sure ticket. Low risk. His ticket was set as the nominee and with certainty it was his horse she rode in on. Nevermind he was THE liberal for sure, but the personal gain for her was all promise. Nevermind the newborn, the kids, etc. In what, reportedly 24 hours, she was in the saddle waving at the masses....with......John McCain?
The loss to Obama was followed with the next low risk, the no-risk-at-all trademark, then the no-risk crap for cash campaign, (books, videos, paraphenalia) and the no-risk celebrity paychecks.
So, until the nominee emerges, set and sure, and relatively certain, her lips are sealed. For FOX cash, of course, until they clear her to speak, which she wouldn’t do anyway, but which is nice to have an excuse if one should be needed.
Meow.. I know. But just sayin’.
ZZZZzzzzzzzzz.
True an endorsement is just a crutch one uses to justify their action. A true conservative is a free thinker and has no leader only people they respect.
Let's all write in "None Of The Above" on our primary ballots just to show 'em!
Perry handled Chris Wallace EXACTLY the same way, on Sunday, to the EXACT same smear. I have missed any mention of that additional venue for the Perry smack down.
He certainly has come along way, and the fact is that no candidate differs from Perry on the border issue, nor have these all brilliant contenders turned what would be lemons into lemonade for the economy on JOBS, nor have these unchallenged contenders saved any taxpayer one red cent by having an illegal pay their own dang way in college tuition costs.
Trump that. Er.....I know, your candidate didn’t do it, can’t do it, and is ensconced somewhere where they didn’t have to do it. LOL!
No argument here. But I don't have a heart, apparently, because I disagree with him.
Bump
If you think like this then 0bama is guaranteed the reelection and he wouldn’t even have to try hard. Is that what you want? I sure hope not
No Worries Mate! :)
LOL!
That's a hoot coming from a "CAINConservative" or CAIN-anything!
You will see Perry coming in a pathetic 5th today and drop out tomorrow.
As for Herman..
Thank God, Cain did not run...Perry woulda came in 6th then!
Time for you to find a 2nd choice. Perry = toast tonight.
And drops out Wednesday. Sorry. Deal with it, dudette.
Fair enough, my friend.
Fair enough, my friend.
Cain did run...until he got caught with his pants down...and ran out.
Conservatives get knocked down and get back up again. On to the next state....
By the way, is Santorum expecting an endorsement from Arlen Spechter?
I somehow missed the Perry/Politico ‘you got a name?’ dustup.
Find your own version on youtube: this is Perry the man, the warrior. Trashing a Journolister 101: use ‘stop hitting yourself’, this is hilarious.
Go Perry!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.