Posted on 01/03/2012 10:42:50 AM PST by nickcarraway
He didn’t have to perpetuate the media lie. You are basically saying Gingrich will regurgitate anything the media says. I don’t want a president like that.
I could see the girlie boys at NR renaming it RR for Romney Review and then claiming it was in homage to Ronald Reagan.
I'm ready to use the paper version as a fireplace starter.
Gingrich is certainly not on his game of late. I think he's stunned that it's not a college debating society after all.
Regards,
TS
“Gingrich = Rombot”
What does your comment even mean?
I just don’t get it.
But instead; snap, instantaneously, Newt draws the distinction and turns it on the media - no, I was Romney boated.The Newt distinction - swift boating is legitimately telling the truth, whereas Romney-boating is a smear campaign.Newt is simply brilliant on his feet no one else comes close.
If your interpretation is correct, O’Neill should not have taken offense at all, and comes across as taking an unnecessary shot at Gingrich.
...The definition is (from wikipedia) the term swiftboating or Swift Boating is now commonly used to refer to what the New York Times describes as the nastiest of campaign smears...
If that is what wiki says, it sure needs to be challenged. The left does not GET to define and create words, especially to whitewash Kerry and smear the swiftboat veterans as smear-mongers
Ng, I can see this fellow taken offense- it’s understandable. But, it’s also obvious from his comment that Newt wouldn’t be his candidate even had Newt not made the statement-—
It was the media who used the term “Swift-boated.” Gingrich specifically said NO, he was not Swift-boated - he was Romney-boated. He specifically made a distinction FROM Swift Boat Veterans, and the Swift Boat campaign against Kerry. He specifically blamed the attacks on him where they belong, on Romney. I think he was differentiating, not equating.
Holy crap, Nick, I admire your fire and I think I see eye to eye on most everything with you post.
And I’m not much of a Gingrich supporter, unless of course by some miracle he ends up as the candidate opposing the Obamanation.
But I think you’ve read this thing wrong. Gingrich didn’t invoke the Swiftboat vets or the Swiftboat terminology. A REPORTER did...a reporter who clearly thought that “Swiftboat” is a negative term and wanted to see if Gingrich would agree with him.
Gingrinch instead turned the term back on the scumbag reporter, saying that no, he wasn’t swiftboated, he was Romney-boated....which I took to mean that he respected the Swiftboaters and what they had done, as opposed to his feelings about what Romney had done.
Just my take on the exchange....
Then go on to respond to Romney's attacks. And it's bad strategy to be responding to Romney, he ought to be on the attack. Let Romney respond to him.
Romney's a target rich environment.
If I could photoshop, I'd take a pic of Black Bart holding a gun to his head, replace it with Gingrich's head with the caption: "Don't move or I blow this Speaker's head off." That appears to be the Gingrich campaign.
I saw one of the commercials on cable. It accuses Newt of getting paid >1.6 M $ by Fannie and Freddie and doing a climate change commercial with Pelosi, and being for amnesty. Newt never says what exactly is in these ads that are lies. Kerry never said what in the Swift Boat ads were lies either. I guess that's why Newt says he was 'boated' .
Expect Newt to launch more attacks on Romney, should be fun to watch.
Tell it brother.
You didn't get that from me. ;-)
To me, the “swiftboating” reference means bringing forth the historical truth in a candidate’s past that reflects badly upon that candidate. For Gingrich to complain about “Romney-boating”is to deny the truth and to set himself up as a liberal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.