Apparently he drank Gore's Kool Aid. Hopefully he's figured out it's a scam.
Posted on 01/02/2012 6:08:12 PM PST by mas cerveza por favor
How about he come out and say he would knock the EPA back 20 years?
Here’s a clue.
The USA doesn’t have a pollution problem anymore.
We have a production problem, and an energy problem.
Good! Your climate change crap is destroying this country.
Apparently he drank Gore's Kool Aid. Hopefully he's figured out it's a scam.
I would say Newt probably “proof” read the chapter and did not like what was written and killed it. Unlike Ron Paul who claims to know nothing about what is in his newsletters. Sure Ron.
He sure did:
Newt Gingrich destroys MSNBC reporter http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsUw2Vq8UMw&feature=related
.
Newt On Fire! Hammers ObamaCare and Media http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=6DdrMBSI5Xk
Newt Rips Gore's 'Facts' To Pieces
On the Congressional record in the House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee.
He sure did:
Newt Gingrich destroys MSNBC reporter:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsUw2Vq8UMw&feature=related
.
Newt On Fire! Hammers ObamaCare and Media:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=6DdrMBSI5Xk
its almost like newt is running for office or something...
I trust Newt about as far as I can throw him.
Newt acts conservative when it suits his purposes to act conservative.
so he was against it before he was for it...ya someone else is the busted one...
Yup, in this video, Gingrich addresses the way left wing government erodes American Exceptionalism, why religious freedom is opposed by dictatorships, the work ethic, unemployment compensation, economic growth, 2+2=4, and government barriers to job creation.
Unfortunately too few folks bother to pay attention to Gingrich's past successes and philosophy and would rather focus on his "baggage."
"Newt Gingrich Speaks to Wake County (North Carolina) GOP, Part 2"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y42oQgOb7OE&feature=related
Gingrich did not dispute the Climate Change theory in this testimony, only certain facts that were cited by Gore.
You need to buy a clue. His testimony before the House was before he started his book.
Yep. How do you dispute a theory that isn’t proved one way or the other? You bring facts to the table that put it in doubt. Face it, you don’t have what it takes to even conceive of an intelligent position. lol
Well then, Ron Paul's your guy.
What about the Climate Change chapter reportedly planned for Gingrich’s book? Were Rush Limbaugh and the facts of this article wrong?
His record is solidly conservative when it comes to legislative accomplishments which seems like a better measure of what he will do than nitpicking every comment he has made out of office.
There is no scientific consensus on AGW. And Newt knows it. That's why the issue is death to his chances with a lot of conservatives.
That was a long time ago. More recently he made an ad with Nancy Pelosi as "part of the "We Can Solve It" global warming ad campaign sponsored by former Vice President Al Gore's Alliance for Climate Protection."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.