Posted on 12/28/2011 10:52:25 PM PST by Eleutheria5
Edited on 12/28/2011 11:18:38 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
You cut aid to Israel and you also cut the U.S. leash on the Israeli Military. Thus they get to finish off their enemies.
Otherwise we will continue to spend billion and spill more American Blood.....for what? Another built up Islamic Country that considers U.S. infidels and mandates in their Constitutions..”NO LAW SHALL CONTRADICT ISLAM”
Cut the aid to and the leash on Israel, and let Israel cut the throat of Islam. Win Win.
Clinton: I didn’t have sex with that woman.
Looks like Pauls people are getting very nervous now that the anti Semitic views of of his are coming out. This is the biggest load of BS. Liar Liar Pants on Fire.
I’ve thought it also - that Ron Paul and his ilk are being funded by the Muslims.
So let me get this straight, this guy wants to give Israel to the Arabs and he thinks he is the most Pro Israel? WOW I dont know what kind of narcotics this dude is on but he needs to cut down
The Islamofascists will still get plenty of aid. If the US doesn’t give it, the PRC or Russia will. That’s what happened to the Tripartite Pact block on military aid to any Middle Eastern country, in effect from 1948 through about 1953, when the USSR started sending huge military aid to Egypt via Czechoslovakia. So, Israel will have a cut leash, but also legs cut out from under, because we will have no way to counter a huge increase in aid to Islamofascistia from the PRC, the former of which will then move in for the kill. Lose/Lose.
Israel has over 100 nukes. Its legs can annihilate all of Islum in one day.
oh Ron Paul you F***** liar
Don’t be stupid.
You are defending the continued spending of untold billions on Muslim nations, despite their increasing slaughter Middle Eastern Christians? If you are really against Islamofascists, why would you want to continue sending them our tax dollars?
That would be the drug addicts, recreational pot smokers, retards, military haters, bigots, racists, and liberal college students part of Iowa. Period.
I believe that would assume that to include those that adhere to the literal meaning of the Constituion.
That notwithstanding, it would include those having a different philosophy than what may be best for the Republic in the grand scheme of things.
I’m uncertrain whether or not Paul being construed as a Constitutional “strict consstructionist” if Paul’s political philosophies may actually be in the best interest of the Republic.
Perhaps compromise is the best order of business, eh? Yep, compromise between the Paultards and the Republic realists. When push comes to shove everybody knows that Paultards are “pie in the sky Utopians” and every other conservative is firmly grounded in reality.
Sort of akin to Coultard, right?
Yep, that and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu is an idiot.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVORRHn7rg8
Sort of makes one wonder why we should support Paultards such as those leading Israel.
I would oppose giving them your tax dollars, but if you also stop military supplies to Israel, you are basically signing our death warrant, because while nobody else will supply us, except possibly India (emphasis on possibly), plenty of large countries will be lining up to supply the Islamofascists, especially the PRC and Russia, as of old. They want influence in the region. They want to disrupt US interests. The Islamofascists will then note that while they are in clover, we are out in the cold, and promptly start yet another war to annihilate us. We have a good record with regards to such wars, and did not get any major help from the US until 1973 (In 1967, France was in our corner, while the US was helping Jordan), but the first time we lose one will also be the last.
Annihilating Islam would also make Israel uninhabitable for a number of years. Also, the doomsday option is a very poor one. See Larry Heineman, Starship Trooper, for the details, as well as Childhood’s End by AC Clarke.
I think it is time for Rand to fill out the commitment paperwork.
This is clever claptrap. The US has never sent troops to defend Israel. Israel has never asked the US to send troops here. Nobody has ever even seriously advocated sending troops to defending Israel. The one time the US sent troops, in Lebanon, it was to keep Israel from rolling up the PLO. So he’s beating up on a straw man, unless you believe that the two wars fought with Iraq were all about Israel, which is a total lie (unless the Jooos! really are behind all wars).
What he is talking about is ending all military assistance to Israel; i.e, no more weapons or financing of R&D for weapons, or joint R&D. While he’s at it, he also wants to end all aid to the Islamofascist states, and let us free to defend ourselves. Sure. So long as the balance of force here remains stable, that sounds good. Only it definitely won’t.
Thanks. I have never seen that vid before - or anything like it. MSM did a good job of hiding it from me!
Paul is the actual Muslim. Obama is just a leftist.
Be thankful that your government is not like the America’s, with both parties committed to massive Islamic immigration. I would not recommend dependency upon the US. Our country is likely to fall if the bipartisan establishment remains in power.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.