Skip to comments.
The Case for Newt Gingrich
spectator.org ^
| 12/28/2011
| PETER FERRARA
Posted on 12/28/2011 6:54:27 AM PST by TBBT
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
If not Newt, It will be Mitt.
Keeping clinging to second tier hopefuls. You'll ensure that Mitt gets it.
1
posted on
12/28/2011 6:54:29 AM PST
by
TBBT
To: TBBT
Thanks for your work TBBT!
2
posted on
12/28/2011 7:00:30 AM PST
by
mmanager
(Reagan Revolution + Republican Revolution = Bury Obama in 2012 - Go Newt!)
To: mmanager; TitansAFC
3
posted on
12/28/2011 7:01:40 AM PST
by
mmanager
(Reagan Revolution + Republican Revolution = Bury Obama in 2012 - Go Newt!)
To: TBBT
I’d go for Newt, pimples and all, anyday over Mitt. Newt shows some good traits that Mitt would not have on his best day.
4
posted on
12/28/2011 7:02:21 AM PST
by
izzatzo
( Anybody but Obamney and Huntsman--Bachmann/Santorum 2012.)
To: TBBT
I was a Fred Thompson guy the last go around. Others were Huckabee fanatics. Neither side would give an inch. South Carolina rolled around and it was all over. We done ourselves in and McCain marched away with it....
History repeats itself...
5
posted on
12/28/2011 7:04:31 AM PST
by
TBBT
To: TBBT
WHY do we always have to compromise? I'm so sick of getting mccains (without Sarah) I WILL NOT vote for mitt or paul or newt. No one is perfect, but has the republican party joined the 1990 liberals in saying character does not matter? Do we have to take someone who changes like the wind or a crazy old man who will let us get hit before he hits them & then will not go to war if he does not get approval from the house & senate? What if the house & senate is filled with anti-war socialist? Do we just let the country go down to avoid war?
To: TBBT
“Keeping clinging to second tier hopefuls. You’ll ensure that Mitt gets it.”
Man that hit’s it on the head!
We are eating our own here. DU, KOS, Huff and Axlerod are having a blast reading our post’s here at FR.
Time to get serious and focus on how we can get rid of Romney and Obama. Only one has that chance....NEWT!!!!
7
posted on
12/28/2011 7:09:38 AM PST
by
mmanager
(Reagan Revolution + Republican Revolution = Bury Obama in 2012 - Go Newt!)
To: TBBT
Reality is hard for most of them. They are mostly dreamers and Idealists/Perfectionists. (Look at the Palin fiasco for example, many of them are still cling to that insanity and call it hope.)
8
posted on
12/28/2011 7:09:45 AM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
To: TBBT
President - Gingrich
Vice President - Bachmann
Secretary of State - Bolton
Secretary of Defense - West
Secretary of Commerce - Cain
Attorney General - Issa
9
posted on
12/28/2011 7:10:38 AM PST
by
ILS21R
(Never give up.)
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: TBBT
Thanks for sharing the article. In recent days, I have struggled over who to support in this nomination process. I had determined to stick with Michelle Bachmann because she best represents my conservative values of the available candidates. However, I am coming to the realization that she isn't going to win this nomination and I certainly don't want Mitt Romney benefiting from my vote for a candidate who has little chance of winning.
My primary happens on March 6 and it looks more and more like I am going to cast my vote for Newt. I still think Newt is flawed in many ways but I also believe he's got the fire in his belly to take Obama down to the mat during the general election and to beat Obama, we are going to need a fighter.
11
posted on
12/28/2011 7:14:38 AM PST
by
SamAdams76
(I am 39 days away from outliving Marty Feldman)
To: mmanager; Jim Robinson
[We are eating our own here. DU, KOS, Huff and Axlerod are having a blast reading our posts here at FR.]
You are right! It is not only an embarrassment, it is an utter disgrace! You can also bet that the MSM has also been reading, looking for ways to go after Newt.
Jim Rob was right; “Loose Lips, Sink Ships!”
12
posted on
12/28/2011 7:15:36 AM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
To: Linda Frances
See #8! You ARE the problem. Absolutely no doubt about that!
13
posted on
12/28/2011 7:17:28 AM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
To: TBBT
Well I'm no big Mitt fan but I think his campaign is correct here:
Appearing in Portsmouth, Romney noted a statement that Gingrichs campaign director compared the former House speakers recent inability to qualify for the Virginia ballot as a setback comparable to Pearl Harbor from which the campaign would recover.
I think he compared that to Pearl Harbor? I think its more like Lucille Ball at the chocolate factory , Romney said in reference to the famous I Love Lucy skit in which the comedienne was overwhelmed by a rapid assembly line of candies. Youve got to get it organized."
Newt's campaign is a mess. It was never prepared to win.
To: Linda Frances
This is what we are stuck with. What is the alternative? Oh, I’m not going to the poll’s because someone is not my ideological candidate?
We HAVE to get this guy out of office. We can’t take our ball home and not vote for “any of the above”. Our country is at the place of distruction.
This is the most serious election of our life time.
15
posted on
12/28/2011 7:18:14 AM PST
by
mmanager
(Reagan Revolution + Republican Revolution = Bury Obama in 2012 - Go Newt!)
To: littlesorrel
You are one brain dead, deranged Troll n00b! Either that, or you are a Paultard. (Please respond, we are getting bored and are in need of a new plaything.)
16
posted on
12/28/2011 7:20:15 AM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
To: ILS21R
President - Gingrich
Vice President - Bachmann
Secretary of State - Bolton
Secretary of Defense - West
Secretary of Commerce - Cain
Attorney General - Issa””
You sir are an excellent judge of leaders.
17
posted on
12/28/2011 7:21:43 AM PST
by
Neoliberalnot
((Read "The Grey Book" for an alternative to corruption in DC))
To: PSYCHO-FREEP; littlesorrel
Why can’t he/she be both? We’ve had an influx of Paul trolls.
18
posted on
12/28/2011 7:24:37 AM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Linda Frances
WHY do we always have to compromise? I'm so sick of getting mccains (without Sarah) I WILL NOT vote for mitt or paul or newt.
Then you will be voting for Mitt Romney, although indirectly. You will do exactly what I described in reply #5. Some will come to accept reality. Others never will. Call it compromise or whatever you choose. For those who refuse, we'll have you to thank for Mitt Romney.
19
posted on
12/28/2011 7:25:24 AM PST
by
TBBT
To: DJlaysitup
Newt is no dummy. If he is working for Romney it is in Romney’s interest to have Newt look not prepared.Notice that Newt is not going negative on Romney but the other guys. Calling Romney a Moderate is a compliment.He’s liberal.Plausible deniability.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson