Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich Unloads on Paul: Worse Than Obama
NationalJournal ^ | 12-27-2011 | Jill Lawrence

Posted on 12/27/2011 7:11:24 PM PST by bimboeruption

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: bimboeruption
I don't need to do any research, Bimbo. I know all about Gingrich and the more you dig, the worse it gets. But never compare someone who is at least pro American to someone who is an absolute kook, racist and very dangerous when it comes to foreign policy. Obama is better than Ron Paul.
21 posted on 12/27/2011 7:52:08 PM PST by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

“I don’t need to do any research, Bimbo. I know all about Gingrich and the more you dig, the worse it gets. But never compare someone who is at least pro American to someone who is an absolute kook, racist and very dangerous when it comes to foreign policy. Obama is better than Ron Paul.”

Gingrich pro-American? Hardy-Har-Har-Har. What has he ever done to serve our country without being paid (quite well) to do it?

PRO-GINGRICH is more like it.


22 posted on 12/27/2011 8:03:37 PM PST by bimboeruption (Clinging to my Bible and my HK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

Really, A student of Saul Alinsky that is taking this country beyond 16 trillion in debt ,hates Christians and whose wife was never proud of this country is better than Ron Paul? I would look hard at where Obama will take this country in the next four years. It won’t be pretty.


23 posted on 12/27/2011 8:04:44 PM PST by pterional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

“This is really a stupid thing for Newt to do.”

I assume you think it was OK when Paul was attacking Newt? However you don’t like it when Newt attacks Paul.


24 posted on 12/27/2011 8:06:22 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
I don’t want Romney, Newtie or Paul.....Huntsman either.

I hope you enjoy Obama's second term.

25 posted on 12/27/2011 8:07:34 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
I hope you enjoy Obama’s second term

That does not make sense at all when we have two perfect conservatives running. I don't know what is wrong with people this primary but to ignore Bachmann and especially Santorum who are the bonified conservatives is a sin if you ask me.

26 posted on 12/27/2011 8:10:17 PM PST by napscoordinator (Anybody but Romney, Newt, Perry, Huntsman, Paul. Perry and Obama are 100 percent the same!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

“BAchmann and Santorum are our ONLY OPTIONS..”

Looks that way to me as well.


27 posted on 12/27/2011 8:12:07 PM PST by bimboeruption (Clinging to my Bible and my HK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
BAchmann and Santorum are our ONLY OPTIONS..

Obama loves you!

28 posted on 12/27/2011 8:12:54 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

-—I am not a Paul supporter at all but at least he...does not have a potential First Lady who basically stole a husband from a wife.-—

With all the negatives on Newt that’s the toughest one for me. A Republican First Lady that that makes Michele O look classy.


29 posted on 12/27/2011 8:14:28 PM PST by running_dog_lackey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

Ron Paul is the only one of the Republican candidates I could not vote for. His foreign policy views are just way too wrong and dangerous. I could not vote for Obama either, of course.


30 posted on 12/27/2011 8:15:38 PM PST by Charles Henrickson (Constitutional conservative Republican who wants to win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
That does not make sense at all when we have two perfect conservatives running.

Neither one of whom stands a snowball's chance in hell of actually being elected in a contest with Obama.

31 posted on 12/27/2011 8:15:56 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

He doesn’t have a chance to win the nomination, but if by some fluke he did win it, that would be the end of the Republican Party. He would be the first Pubbie nominee to get booed. There’s no way he’d be able to get through an acceptance speech. I will not vote that scoundrel.


32 posted on 12/27/2011 8:22:17 PM PST by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx

Hold it. Rasmussen has Newtie losing to Obama 48-36 points. Newtie will be a disaster if nominated. I can just see the comercial of Barack and Michelle sitting by the fire place where they say “They just celebrated 20 years of faithful marriage.” Then show a picture of Newtie and his mistress (current wife) who stole him from his second wife. What a complete disaster. Luckily it looks like he won’t be the nominee. I think Santorum is going to pull it out.


33 posted on 12/27/2011 8:24:02 PM PST by napscoordinator (Anybody but Romney, Newt, Perry, Huntsman, Paul. Perry and Obama are 100 percent the same!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx

[ BAchmann and Santorum are our ONLY OPTIONS.. / Obama loves you! ]

If the american people DO NOT want a conservative.. SO BE IT..
They NEED more Obama.. deserve more Obama.. and will get more Obama..

I’m NOT FOR TRICKING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE..
Republicans could either be delusional -OR- generally socialists..
The New World Order is wholly progressive.. many republicans are one worlders..


34 posted on 12/27/2011 8:26:30 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
THANK YOU! Modelbreaker.

That is what I keep saying. I know a few of his supporters, and most are solely because of his views on financial matters. You don't call his supporters, or him, which they keep calling college kids who want legal drugs, when MANY are not, outside the realm of decent people!! How is that any different from what Democrats do?? And you don't go way overboard in stating where he stands on issues other than the economy. Agree with him or not, and I don't, he has not said a lot of things the R's in the race keep stating he said. Thant is too big a voting block to alienate and denigrate.

35 posted on 12/27/2011 8:26:42 PM PST by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: StraightDave

No we don’t vet the first Lady, BUT how she carries herself, her views, her character should matter. To understand why, look at the one we have!


36 posted on 12/27/2011 8:29:06 PM PST by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

What Newt said was HIS SUPPORTERS are outside the realm of reality. He was attacking supporters, STUPID move.


37 posted on 12/27/2011 8:35:03 PM PST by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
If you look at the latest Rasmussen polling, Santorum actually does better against Obama than Gingrich. Santorum loses by 10; Gingrich by 11.

Newt is hardly the most electable Republican, contrary to what his supporters say and he has taken a lot of hits in the past two weeks (many self-inflicted).

38 posted on 12/27/2011 8:37:29 PM PST by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

I can’t understand it either naps.


39 posted on 12/27/2011 8:37:57 PM PST by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
I worry about losing Ron Paul votes as much as I worry about losing the votes of NAACP members.

Good point. When it comes down to it. Paul supporters accept the idea that 9/11 was an "inside job." I don't want to be on their side. I'd rather go down in the bunker than stand with them.

40 posted on 12/27/2011 9:09:27 PM PST by outofstyle (Down All the Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson