“Newt Romney” and Crony Capitalism

Michele Bachmann for President ^ | December 15th, 2011

[John360]

Newt is a Pelosi “republican.” Check his voting record.

1. Voted for MFN for China.
2. Voted for taxpayer money to help Chinese exports
3. Voted for GATT/WTO (the WTO wants to disarm you)
4. Voted for billions for the UN.
5. Voted for the Dept of Education
6. Voted for hundreds of millions for the IRS
7. Voted for Amnesty during Reagan.
8. Fed at the corrupt Fannie & Freddie trough with Rahm & Gorelnick.
9. Mega s*ck up to his buddy Clinton in NH back in the day.
Remember how he was gonna fight for us.
10. Friend of Pelosi and Global Warming.

Newt made conservatives look like fools thinking he was on our side. He worked to push RINO house members and hurt conservatives.

He mentions Reagan in his speeches but he is all NWO/CFR all the time when he votes and acts. He is as loyal to conservative voters as he is to his wives (plural).

He is paid up CFR member since the 1970s as he worked for Nelson Rockefeller.

Newt is the worst choice. Huntsman is probably even better. Rick Santorum is light years more conservative than Newt. Rick Santorum is an honorable man. Newt is not.

Vote for any of them except Newt and probably Huntsman.

Newt never met a global govt agency stealing your rights away that he did not fully embrace. The most recent was Global Warming. Newt jumped on the GW bandwagon $$$$ then GW was nuke by the leaked emails. LOL! Newt is a GOre “republican.”

Vote for pretty much any of the Republicans except NWO Newt. He is no better than McCain and Graham-nesty who just voted to send us to the gulag if we speak up.

[takenoprisoner]

The govt picking the winners, and the losers. All the socialists, who voted for TARP, should at the least, be held accountable for violating their sworn duty protect and defend The Constitution of the United States.

Bachmann and Paul voted against it. Newt, admitting he supported it, would have voted for it.

[hinckley buzzard]

I reached that point with her, Santorum, and Paul months ago.

Since none of them has a chance of winning anything, we have to assume their presence is motivated by the desire to destroy the republican candidate, whoever that may be, and insure the re-election of Obama.. A pretty disgraceful and unethical purpose.

America does not need these termites.

[hinckley buzzard]

Newt is not a “back bencher” -— He is the former SPEAKER, quite the opposite of a back bencher.

Bachmann is the true backbencher. Four years of anonymity, did nothing. Period. Nothing to offer now except mouth.

[Kansas58]

Got it!
My apologies

[SoConPubbie]

Since none of them has a chance of winning anything, we have to assume their presence is motivated by the desire to destroy the republican candidate, whoever that may be, and insure the re-election of Obama.. A pretty disgraceful and unethical purpose.

Back away from the bong FRiend, you've been smoking too much crack!

[Cobra64]

I was an ardent Bachmann supporter but have just recently sent her a "Dear John" letter.

I don't like ankle biters, which is what Bachmann has become.