Posted on 12/16/2011 9:06:03 AM PST by Brookhaven
I was speaking of Judge Burke. He was telling the truth, in detail.
If the country had listened to him, and the truth he told, instead of to the purveyors of death, more than 54 million of our fellow human beings would still alive.
Do you disagree?
I can't speak for the numbers, but more would be alive. Provided "the country" listened to him, and agreed with him.
Do you have a plan to make that happen?
You insure that they keep protecting the rights of the people by, in the first place, demanding that they do so, according to the obligations of their oaths of office.
If the demand is not made by We the People, they will simply continue to do what they have been doing.
Yeah. Get all the Christians to stop offering any political aid and comfort to those who won't keep the first obligations of the oath.
How do We the People make that demand? Do we send faxes and emails from "We the People"?
How do you plan to do that?
We make that demand in every sphere of our political activity.
I thought you wanted to turn it over to the federal government. Once you do that, state and local don't have any say any more. There's no basis for making demands of them, because they can't do anything about it.
No. The sworn duty to protect innocent life is intrinsic to the oath of every officer of government, at every level, in every branch.
I never said any such thing. As per the requirements of Article 6, Section three, every officer, in every branch, has sworn to support the Constitution, which requires explicitly and imperatively that every persons right to life be protected.
The farther you get from your local government the fewer the spheres of influence you can bring to bear, and the less opportunity you have to hold them accountable.
There is one mechanism that the States can use to exert control over the federal government, and has the potential to bring all the spheres of influence to bear, involving every political entity right down to the individual voter. But you don't like it.
Which says:
"No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.""No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law."
-- Article VI, the United States Constitution“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution..."
“”PS: I have a god given right to take whatever I want.”
I don’t know why I’m wasting my time replying to somebody who could even type that, much less post it for all the world to see.”
I have no trouble accepting the fact that i am “wasting my time” replying to someone so closed mined as to actually beleive every right God gave us can never be ceded in part by us to a goverment in exchange certain protections of our remaining rights.
News flash: God gave us every right we have & could ever have. God did not define which rights we had to cede to our goverment to protect the other God given rights. Simply put: God did not create our Goverment.
God created us naturally free.
“Yeah ? Then why does RuPaul support the abortion drug RU-486?...One thing I will always resent about the Liberaltarian bowel movement is how they try to twist leftist positions (homosexual “rights”, abortion on demand, legalized heroin, etc.) into Conservative positions and then attempt to lecture Conservatives when they don’t go along with the plan.”
NARAL gives Ron Paul a 93% anti-choice lifetime rating and 100% anti-choice rating in just the last year, from what I’ve seen. Not many folks who’ve been in office as long as he has can claim the same. Who’s your preference—Romney? Gingrich?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.