NO THANKS, NO NEWT

boblonsberry.com ^ | 12/16/11 | Bob Lonsberry

[sodpoodle]

ping

[Rutles4Ever]

Romney is going to be the next President whether we like it or not.

Need to focus on Congress and keep a strong Tea Party presence to hold his feet to the fire on social and economic conservatism.

[Kahuna]

I feel ya pal, however I will weigh the pros & cons of each candidate and cast my vote based on my gut instincts. If I voted today, it would be for Newt.

[ATOMIC_PUNK]

I'm still of the belief that the ultimate nominee has not been on stage

The problem is everyone on stage has their own agenda and there agenda's don't follow any form or function of America or Americans being a free nation "we the people " are slowly being forced to become we the sheeple and our so called leaders are only interested in being above any law written by man or God !

[skeeter]

If Newt is nominated I'll break my arm pulling the lever for him.

And thats all I'll say about it.

[em2vn]

I’m not a Newt fan but I will vote for him if he is the candidate. ABO, anybody but Obama.
This thing was heavy on accusations and light on specifics.

[BenKenobi]

“Sorry, but at this point Newt is the only one left who can hold the pass against a Romney victory. The others can’t: Bachmann’s a desperate psycho, Santorum’s a whiner, and Perry’s ability to articulate coherent thoughts is dubious at best.”

Dunno, things are pretty good here in Perry’s Texas. We need to nominate someone who is going to be conservative, and I don’t trust Newt to do the right thing when the chips are on the line.

I do trust him to pass some absolutely baffling stuff. Like look at Bush Sr. I can completely see Newt nominating another Souter.

[Lakeshark]

I'm still of the belief that the ultimate nominee has not been on stage in the debates as yet. That's my hope.

The likelihood of that happening is so close to zero, a math genius would have a hard time quantifying how small that chance is.

Gingrich has a lot of flaws, I don't trust him in several ways, but this article is utter nonsense.

[BenKenobi]

The problem is that we have a choice between Burger King and McDonalds. Both Newt and Romney are the picks of the establishment, and if they can cut down the competition, then they can basically say, “here are your choices”. You can go on and on about how bad Mickey D’s is.

[shortstop]

"I still smell a troll and me thinks they need to go home to dummies unlimited."

So, as I understand it, anyone who doesn't agree with your view is a troll. right? Who is the dummy?

[Yashcheritsiy]

Yeah. We picked a nice man last time. How’d that work out for ya Bob?

Here's hoping Newt isn't nice enough to tell the voters that they shouldn't fear voting for his opponent.

[LibLieSlayer]

newt is destroying his own chances... his support was never firm and he will be bottom tier soon. Just sit back and watch and enjoy the vindication of your opinion.

LLS

[oh8eleven]

Bob Lonsberry
As if anyone gives a $hit what Loser-berry has to say.

[Cringing Negativism Network]

Yes thanks. Yes Newt.

:D

[TheWriterTX]

It's attacks like these that have helped me make up my mind.

I'm all in for Newt Gingrich.

[mnehring]

I'm still of the belief that the ultimate nominee has not been on stage in the debates as yet.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but what was in front of you last night is what you get. Way too many filing deadlines have passed and the dreams of a brokered convention could actually be a nightmare when once considers who would do the brokering.

[Obadiah]

Yeah, exactly.

[HereInTheHeartland]

“Because a brilliant bad man is still a bad man, and Newt Gingrich is a bad man.”

So we want “non brilliant” candidates??

[cripplecreek]

Sorry, but at this point Newt is the only one left who can hold the pass against a Romney victory.

Then there's no point in voting in the presidential race.

[Cringing Negativism Network]

Rather than imitate Comrade Alinsky, how about you go search tirelessly for an article to post, in favor of your candidate.

Who is your candidate?

Are you ashamed to say?