Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dick Cheney: Don't "Underestimate" Newt Gingrich
Rea Clear Politics ^ | December 12,2011

Posted on 12/13/2011 6:43:37 AM PST by Hojczyk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: RockinRight
Ya know, your tagline got me thinking. If Newt is indeed the nominee, I think his chance of beating Obama is far better than conventional wisdom.

I'm one of those skeptics who was still shocked by Gingrich leading the Republicans to victory in Congress in 1994 like he did. Not necessarily my favorite candidate, but I see now why so many FReepers say we need a guy who is as battle-tested in taking on the Democrats at a national level and leading Republicans to victory as Gingrich is.

I have no problem getting behind Gingrich. He's making Willard sweat in Willard's "safe" states, there is no baggage that has not already been unearthed by the Democrats in years past, and I get a sense in the debates that he is spoiling for a fight with Obama and the Democrats while most of the other candidates are just going through the motions or looking for quick little soundbites that play well on Youtubes and that were rehearsed hours in advance of the debates.
41 posted on 12/13/2011 4:37:34 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
Photobucket
42 posted on 12/13/2011 6:11:42 PM PST by vox_freedom (America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Amid all the toxic waste around here it is refreshing to hear about Newt from someone who was actually there, and who actually knows WTF he is talking about.

Having said that, I'm sure we will soon be seeing "Cheney's a RINO!!" scrawled across the wall.

43 posted on 12/13/2011 6:26:07 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
Nicely done.
44 posted on 12/13/2011 6:29:44 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Hmm. So where does newt want to take the presidency? Where is his win this time? I am a Cheney fan.


45 posted on 12/13/2011 6:31:56 PM PST by Yaelle (Excuse the mobile device errors please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WPaCon
Don't be misled. The "unelectable" card is only played on Newt by liberal trolls who want to see Obama re-elected. We have an unprecedented number of them infesting the site these days. But you are on the right track so, no worries!
46 posted on 12/13/2011 6:37:05 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Excellent post.


47 posted on 12/13/2011 6:40:04 PM PST by Yaelle (Excuse the mobile device errors please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CowboyJay
Fact, the EPA and the dollar were fine under Reagan, they only have been degraded under subsequent administrations, including George Bush, unfortunately.
48 posted on 12/13/2011 6:42:00 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

One part Nixon, one part Clinton, one part Reagan...


49 posted on 12/13/2011 7:29:57 PM PST by kenavi (1% of the 1% were born in the 1%.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
"Fact, the EPA and the dollar were fine under Reagan, they only have been degraded under subsequent administrations, including George Bush, unfortunately."

Thus the problem with creating things like the EPA, and debasing the dollar in the first place. Reagan is the exception. The Obamas, Carters, and Nixons are the norm. No tool or responsibility should ever be put in the hands of the government that can't be entrusted to the Hillary Clintons of the world - FACT.
50 posted on 12/13/2011 7:43:59 PM PST by CowboyJay (Lowest Common Denominator 2012 - because liberty was overrated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Dick Cheney: Don’t “Underestimate” Newt Gingrich
______________________________________________________________

Damn straight!!!


51 posted on 12/13/2011 8:48:37 PM PST by no dems (Why do you never see "Obama" bumper stickers on cars going to work in the morning?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Let’s just hope there isn’t a Watergate in Newt’s future if it happens!
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Watergate was a Kindergarten picnic compared to the “Fast and Furious” scandal.


52 posted on 12/13/2011 8:51:23 PM PST by no dems (Why do you never see "Obama" bumper stickers on cars going to work in the morning?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: commish

“but the current times might just need his type of personality”

Seriously???? At the risk of being branded a libtard, a troll or any of the other insulting names which may be attributed to me here on FB, Newt’s personality IS the problem. No appeal at all to the general public. The polls are doing a great job skewing the public perception once again. We’ll lose again to O with Newt.


53 posted on 12/14/2011 6:05:37 AM PST by adc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: adc

Wrong again, Newt’s personality IS exactly why he is in the lead, vary stable and is resonating very strongly with Independents, Tea Party members, Conservatives and even moderate Democrats. Get it? EXACTLY the way Reagan did.

And all of that in light of his past history. It’s definite proof that American can forgive and go on, especially when the stakes are so high. It will take a man like Newt to fix this mess and even better yet, the voters understand that this time around.


54 posted on 12/14/2011 6:12:30 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in t,he road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

“A lame duck Obama could be the worst thing this nation has ever seen.”
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Not only could be but WOULD BE, at least with a certainty of 99.9 percent. As crazy as he is now when he is supposedly trying for reelection there is no limit to the insanity he would bring us as a newly reelected, lame duck, Muslim, Manchurian president. Electing Obama was, for this nation, the equivalent of killing the goose that laid golden eggs. It was the triumph of hope and change over sanity. To think that I used to wonder how the Germans ever allowed the crazy corporal with the funny mustache to take over.


55 posted on 12/14/2011 9:53:46 AM PST by RipSawyer (This does not end well!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

Besides all that anyone who is concerned about Newt’s indiscretions in the past needs to learn the truth about the current occupant of the oval office who is almost certainly bisexual if not exclusively homosexual. Then there is the matter of the man from Hope. He makes Newt look like a rank amateur at the womanizing game and the nation gave him two terms. John Kennedy also made Newt and maybe even Slick Willy look like amateurs at the womanizing game but it was covered up until long after his assassination. LBJ had his mistress on the side also but we never heard about it until she came forward after his death and she had about a thousand times more credibility than any of those who were involved in torpedoing Herman Cain.


56 posted on 12/14/2011 10:03:43 AM PST by RipSawyer (This does not end well!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Most voters don’t understand much about policy. If anything, in this economy they are voting their pocketbooks. Newt is a Washington insider from day one. He won’t ever get past that in this election cycle. Not to mention he sounds like a boring college professor at times. A mean one at that. He’ll never get the uninformed vote, the young vote, the moderate vote. Too strident. Too highbrow. Too duplicitous. Too polarizing.


57 posted on 12/15/2011 9:27:47 AM PST by adc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson