Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Gingrich Churchill?
Townhall.com ^ | December 11, 2011 | Kevin McCullough

Posted on 12/11/2011 3:19:07 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: af_vet_rr
This guy thinks that Mitt Romney is our best hope at keeping Ron Paul from becoming President.

No, I don't think he wrote that at all. He feels Mitt will be beaten by Obama.

"For reasons I've laid out previously Romney will be an easy opponent for Obama to conquer in a general election match-up."

41 posted on 12/11/2011 5:19:42 PM PST by arkady_renko (I want to believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
As a Newt supporter, I feel no need to compare him to Churchill or any of the other titans of world history.

He puts his pants on one leg at a time just like me.

I don't feel any need to compare him to Washington, Truman, William Wallace, Patton, Davy Crockett, or Obi-Wan Kenobi, as do the adherents of another one-time wouldbe candidate.

42 posted on 12/11/2011 5:25:09 PM PST by Notary Sojac (Liberalism: Ideas so good, they have to be mandatory!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Getting tired of the journalists underestimating Gingrich. Americans are STARVED for an intelligent candidate. Newt remained cool last night despite the tough questions on marriage, infidelity, etc. He answered honestly.
Yes, Newt will beat Obama. Newt is the guy Coulter, Rove and Noonan never thought would get above single digit polling numbers; he lacked money, he had too much baggage; he lacked organization; evangelicals and Tea Party folks would not endorse him..what happened? he is SOARING. He is a little Churchillian...I think of the lady telling Churchill that he was drunk and Winston answered back..”madam I may be drunk but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly” or something to that effect...lol. Do I think Newt would say that? no but would Newt shoot a stunner at a fellow debator that would almost be the equivalent of that statement? yes...he is a stun gun


43 posted on 12/11/2011 5:43:58 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
We must draft, nominate and elect Sarah Palin president

You gotta let that go. I love Palin's guts and her history of taking on entrenched corrupt interests, but she would not be able to recover from the image painted of her by the MSM and the GOP establishment.

We have to choose among the candidates still in the race. Wishful thinking will not change that.

44 posted on 12/11/2011 5:50:23 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
yes...he is a stun gun

Perfect.
BTW your screen name sure is fun to type, katiedidit1.

45 posted on 12/11/2011 6:02:25 PM PST by b9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Are bears catholic?


46 posted on 12/11/2011 6:17:07 PM PST by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Is Gingrich Churchill?

No. He's Richard Nixon.

47 posted on 12/11/2011 6:19:23 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The Republican Party is retrograde. And that is not a compliment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Seconded.


48 posted on 12/11/2011 6:21:55 PM PST by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Americans have come to despise intelligence because it is so damn rare. We The People, ourselves, have been so dumbed down since the age of the Founders we can barely screw in the light bulb by comparison. (Now, even the light bulbs are getting smart and dangerous.) Intelligence is openly mocked, in favor of the flavors the elite media disguise as such and pass off.

Chances are that Newt’s “Good Newt” will be more prevalent in the future because of Calista. Figure out Calista and we may have a clearer picture of the new Newt. He seems very happy and generally more humble overall than in the past. Confident and happy. I like it.


49 posted on 12/11/2011 6:39:38 PM PST by RitaOK (wRasmussen- the polling standard for accuracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

and I would vote for Nixon over Obama.


50 posted on 12/11/2011 6:42:46 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

and I would vote for Nixon over Obama.


51 posted on 12/11/2011 6:42:46 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Of course you would.

Personally, given a choice between a baseball bat to the skull and a crowbar to the knee I’ll choose “none of the above.”


52 posted on 12/11/2011 6:45:33 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The Republican Party is retrograde. And that is not a compliment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

You are so right Rita. The selected intellectuals are the media favorites and that applies to both the democrats and republican media darlings. When Newt blew old Sour Kraut the hammer away...I knew we had a tough candidate.


53 posted on 12/11/2011 6:45:57 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Nixon did a lot of good things as president and I have no problem in stating that...Obama has done nothing but damage and some is going to be very hard to UNDO


54 posted on 12/11/2011 6:48:05 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Yeah, but Nixon was also a liberal, one who squandered the political power of the “silent majority.”

Just like Gingrich squandered the political power of the “Republican revolution” of 1994.


55 posted on 12/11/2011 6:58:00 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The Republican Party is retrograde. And that is not a compliment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Disagree with you 100% but not going into a lengthy historical debate with you over Nixon or Newt. I am delighted that so many Tea Party folks, evangelicals and republicans are supporting Gingrich.


56 posted on 12/11/2011 7:08:56 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
In a variety of ways Newt is much like Nixon. After Nixon's losses in 1960 and 1962, the Left believed they had vanquished their arch foe. We had communists gloating about "Alger Hiss dancing on the political grave of Richard Nixon." They then left him for dead.

Nixon remained active however, low profile and behind the scenes, and when 1968 came around he won a narrow but definite victory, followed four years later by a huge landslide.

After they drove Newt out of the Congress in 1999, the Left obviously believed they had finished him off as a political force. Ignored him for years.

Newt stayed active however, refused to lay down. He has continued to be the man of ideas and a questioner of the status quo.

Newt has the potential to recapitulate the Nixon performance, and unlike Nixon he knows how to handle the hostile press. But for Watergate Nixon would have been counted a very successful president. Newt has the same opportunity, and is not likely to pull a Watergate.

57 posted on 12/11/2011 7:32:55 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

I don’t know about that. He seems to me to have a great capacity for turning victory into defeat.


58 posted on 12/11/2011 8:03:18 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The Republican Party is retrograde. And that is not a compliment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Our money is on the NEWT-inator!
He will not back down. He will do more and he will do it better than any of them.
Anyone just not voting or comming out for the other side, because they did not get their first choice of candidate, is a traitor.
Kick their ass!


59 posted on 12/11/2011 8:26:13 PM PST by Cindy of Nashville (What has the Democrat party become???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The comparison is Gingrich is Chamberlain.


60 posted on 12/11/2011 9:44:24 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson