Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Billionaires, Insiders Plan To Place $10-Billion Tax Hike On 2012 California Ballot
LATimes ^ | November 20, 2011 | Anthony York

Posted on 11/20/2011 8:16:51 PM PST by Steelfish

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Steelfish

On the other hand, they could just pass the hat among themselves. But, that would mean actually giving some of their own money.


21 posted on 11/20/2011 9:01:37 PM PST by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

They will never pay a cent more in taxes, they’ll just pass it down to the other 49% that do through increased costs on goods and services but they DO get to feel good about it, gets the MSM off their backs and makes those opposed look bad.


22 posted on 11/20/2011 9:01:46 PM PST by this_ol_patriot (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
its proposal would provide $5 billion more for public schools

It is not for the schools, it's for the teachers!

23 posted on 11/20/2011 9:03:59 PM PST by oldbrowser (There is a shakeup coming to Washington, one way or another.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

what a bunch of cheapasses, any billionaire worth his salt would demand at least 20...hey why not 50!?!? As long as you’re stealing, why not steal big?


24 posted on 11/20/2011 9:17:39 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I like the idea of taxing lawyers. Their industry is created, modified and operated by government. Without government, there would be no lawyers. Lawyers, apart from normal Americans, should be heavily taxed.


25 posted on 11/20/2011 9:19:35 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

California, lol.


26 posted on 11/20/2011 9:25:33 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

My guess is they all sent their children to expensive private schools. How much more $ are we going to throw at government education? Nobody ever asks how they spend the money they get now.


27 posted on 11/20/2011 9:28:21 PM PST by Pining_4_TX ( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blue state conservative

What makes you think ALL services would be included ? If the 5% rate was applied to all services it would amount to a $40B tax increase, not $10B.

This proposal’s purported intention is the same old vote-buying. Families making $45K paying NOTHING in income tax ? What is it about people that think government should be the one thing in life that’s “free” ?

Personally, I wish they WOULD extend the sales tax to ALL services as well as goods. At a 5% rate, it would make the Sales Tax generate $60B/yr. It would reduce the benefits of buying online and give local brick & mortar stores a boost. It would also allow the state Income Tax to be lowered to a flat 3% to generate $45B and eliminate the corporate Income Tax completely. That would be very pro-growth. Put a 50% tax rate on any government employee income greater than $100K and government pensions that exceed $50K.

Also: Nullify all state regulations and force them to start from scratch with business the priority. Require all school districts to offer vouchers for 50% of the per pupil cost they are spending. Require utilities and landlords to run credit and criminal background checks on applicants to scare away illegals.

It wouldn’t really take much to make California the best in the country again.


28 posted on 11/20/2011 9:55:05 PM PST by Kellis91789 (The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

At 5%, the service tax would kill small businesses that can’t pass the cost on to the consumer. Large corporations won’t be affected.

Its an anti-competitive measure. If you’re a Fortune 500 company, this tax won’t affect you. But it could put a small mom and pop business out of business for good.

So much for creating new jobs and in the end it will raise far less revenue than advertised.


29 posted on 11/20/2011 10:33:06 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I’ve lived in Kalifornia my entire 50+ years, and I’m basically counting the days until I turn 62.5 and I can retire and get the hell out of here.

As much as I love my country, it’s going to get worse and in a few more years, I’ll be leaving to retire where the cost of living is much lower and much nicer.


30 posted on 11/20/2011 11:22:04 PM PST by Rodney Dangerfield (The true face of the left that the MSM won't show: www.zombietime.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

As long as they only tax the billionaires, it’s okay with me.


31 posted on 11/20/2011 11:47:09 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

You got it - unions.

Tax initiatives that hit everyone are dead on arrival.

A tax initiative that targets the so called 1% would no doubt pass, but then billions of dollars would leave the state.

When NJ under Corzine passed the “millionaire’s surcharge”, tens of billions in wealth left the state, it was estimated.


32 posted on 11/21/2011 6:12:28 AM PST by randita (I'm not a percentage. I'm a free person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Good idea we can use the extra jobs here in Georgia.


33 posted on 11/21/2011 11:04:21 AM PST by bilhosty (Don' t tax people tax newsprint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Steelfish.
Acting as the Think Long Committee, they want to change the tax system to increase money for public schools and universities and for local governments... includes Google Chairman Eric Schmidt, former governors Gray Davis and Arnold Schwarzenegger and Los Angeles philanthropist Eli Broad... based on a reshuffling of California's tax system. It would lower the state's personal income and sales tax rates and create a new levy of more than 5% on services that are not currently taxed, such as legal work or accounting.
How about limo driving? Or ticket tearing? Or seat-filling? Or better yet, taxing the living sh!+ out of the overpaid ninnies in the entertainment industry, iow, Hollyweird?


34 posted on 11/21/2011 7:18:09 PM PST by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson