Skip to comments.
Conventional War Against Iran Is Not Feasible
Big Peace (Breitbart) ^
| 11/13/11
| Kerry Patton
Posted on 11/13/2011 1:17:21 PM PST by yup2394871293
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
41
posted on
11/13/2011 3:03:50 PM PST
by
SJackson
(Haven't changed the environment, just take a bath. Eat a piece of chocolate. You need one. Michelle)
To: yup2394871293
Conventional War Against Iran Is Not Feasible Depends on what you mean by "conventional".
I'll bet our conventional aircraft borne and naval weapons systems will work quite well on them.
42
posted on
11/13/2011 3:12:03 PM PST
by
ROCKLOBSTER
( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
To: mountainlion
EMPs aren't a super-weapon. They have to be followed up with real assaults, or else the enemy recovers.
43
posted on
11/13/2011 3:22:10 PM PST
by
GAB-1955
(I write books, serve my country, love my wife and daughter, and believe in the Resurrection.)
To: yup2394871293
We had carbon fibers that did a great job on Iranian power lines. They’re cheaper than a nuke.
44
posted on
11/13/2011 3:23:15 PM PST
by
GAB-1955
(I write books, serve my country, love my wife and daughter, and believe in the Resurrection.)
To: MNJohnnie
My thoughts exactly. This guy is talking out of his a@#/.
45
posted on
11/13/2011 3:48:05 PM PST
by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
To: SECURE AMERICA
“Easily,” though? Maybe Granada was easy, but that’s a dangerous prognostication when it comes to wars.
46
posted on
11/13/2011 3:50:36 PM PST
by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
To: yup2394871293
Saudi Arabia is not an ally.
47
posted on
11/13/2011 3:52:43 PM PST
by
Lurker
(The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
To: SoJoCo
The time to prevent it was 7 or 8 years ago. Um NO. You cannot launch major operations into Iran without taking out Iraq 1st. We could not done this 7-8 years ago.
Unfortuantely thanks to electing "Barack "Brave Sir Robin" Obama in 2008 we have now pissed away our hard won strategic advantage in the region.
48
posted on
11/13/2011 4:06:58 PM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
To: MNJohnnie; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...
49
posted on
11/13/2011 4:18:32 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: mountainlion
Yea I know I was just saying it would knock out Iran’s radar radio’s telephones Television everything electronic.
50
posted on
11/13/2011 10:29:24 PM PST
by
tallyhoe
To: GAB-1955
An EMP strike could wipe out a country's power generating capacity all their motor vehicles also. Atomic power plants could be set back 10 years and the nuclear program would be seriously damaged. I think it would work where our embargo falls flat.
51
posted on
11/14/2011 5:52:19 AM PST
by
mountainlion
(I am voting for Sarah after getting screwed again by the DC Thugs.)
To: Lurker
Maybe not, but I don’t think Iraq in 2011 or Turkey is either.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
