Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama touts foreign policy successes in Iraq, Libya (Nobel Peace Prize winner, Mr. Cool)
Yahoo ^ | 10/22/11 | Caren Bohan - Reuters

Posted on 10/22/2011 11:19:26 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: NormsRevenge

I’m curious. What do his left-wing anti-war peacenik faggot raghead baby-murdering constituents think about their Ghetto hero whacking out people?


41 posted on 10/22/2011 3:41:59 PM PDT by LouAvul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


42 posted on 10/22/2011 4:42:09 PM PDT by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Lets keep an eye on Iraq and Libya in the coming months, Hussein. Dont be going all cocky on us, Obumbo


43 posted on 10/22/2011 6:19:20 PM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“powerful reminders of how we’ve renewed American leadership in the world.”

Funny how he had zero foreign policy experience and the MSM made sure that was off the table in 2008. Yet I have a feeling we’ll be hearing plenty about the lack of such experience from the GOP nom.

That quote is hilarious.


44 posted on 10/22/2011 9:00:38 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Obama: The stupid person`s idea of a smart person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"In Iraq, we've succeeded in our strategy to end the war," Obama added.

No one single Republican or journalist is reminding the public that the Status of Forces Agreement arranged by Bush back in late 2008 required the complete withdrawal of US troops from Iraq by December 31, 2011, unless further agreements were reached.

That asshat has done nothing regarding Iraq.

45 posted on 10/23/2011 8:04:03 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
"Didn’t Pres. Bush set the date of our withdrawal from Iraq before he left office?"

Yes. It was in the Status of Fores Agreement that troops be gone by December 31, 2011. Obama has done nothing but steal from Bush.

46 posted on 10/23/2011 8:13:21 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
"Didn’t Pres. Bush set the date of our withdrawal from Iraq before he left office?"

Yes. It was in the Status of Forces Agreement that troops be gone by December 31, 2011. Obama has done nothing but steal from Bush.

47 posted on 10/23/2011 8:13:32 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard; NormsRevenge; Venturer
The circumstances of our withdrawal from Iraq indicate anything but foreign policy success. ... That failure made the full withdrawal without further delay a necessity.

Exactly, Obama is trying to make a virtue of necessity, and trying to sell it as the "success." I wonder though, if the immunity issue was deliberately sabotaged by Obama's negotiating team because he really wanted to withdraw completely and needed a cover of "non-negotiable conditions" to accomplish that. Maliki might have played along, it would make him look tough for his factions - this would be a win-win for Obama's and Maliki's real goals.

Additionally, he is trying to tie the notion of "full withdrawal" as the "end of the Iraq war" which we all know is a lie.

We have won several wars in Iraq, first over Saddam and his forces, and later - using Iraq as preferred field of battle - to demolish the remnants of al-Qaeda and new recruits, which made winning the "war in Iraq" their main goal and holy jihad. Unbeknown to most, the "war in Iraq" became a mousetrap / flypaper / "roach motel" for the al-Qaeda and their recruits who went there to die in large numbers instead of being a fertile breeding ground for worldwide terrorism. This was an overwhelming success that was over well before Obama became the President.

Another problem, that I didn't see being commented on, is that if the "end of the war" requires a full withdrawal of troops from the country whose former regime / government has been defeated, then the U.S. is still at war with Germany, Japan, Italy and in Korea (where NoKo somewhat resembles Iran) because the U.S. keeps the bases and troops there.

Victory has no connection with the "full withdrawal" but Obama is trying to tie them together so he can claim the credit for both "ending the war" and "winning the war" at the same time. Media, of course, bought the tie-in. Of course, Bush failed to take credit for either, so they were on the table for Obama to claim.

48 posted on 10/23/2011 2:11:43 PM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson