Here's my guess - most of them are clueless as to why things aren't working and they want someone - anyone - to make it better.
She has certainly gone "off her meds".
Ah yes that evil TARP which many banks were forced to take and has since been repaid plus interest. Maybe we should be a bit more concerned about an over reaching Federal government playing puppeteer in the private sector Nancy
So, why are they mad at the recipients rather than the White House and the Democratic Congress at that time? Ignorance, as usual?
Grassroots my A$$...
“Make $350-650 a week “protesting” on Wall Street.”
http://newyork.craigslist.org/brk/gov/2618821815.html
He still has the money.
So they are protesting her sorry ass. Thanks Nancy, we did not know.
Seems like on Main Street in the real world, people are kind of laughing at the Occupants. As in, don’t they have anything better to do than pout and make messes?
A question for Pelosi voters: are you embarrassed yet?
Seems like on Main Street in the real world, people are kind of laughing at the Occupants. As in, don’t they have anything better to do than pout and make messes?
Well, from what I have read the banks have essentially paid back what they got in the bail out.
And whatever else they have received in aid has not come from Obumer or the Congress critters but from the printing presses of the Federal Reserve.
The wonderful “gifts” they have received from Obumer and the Congress critters were wrapped up together and called “Frank-Dodd” and included dozens of new ways to turn the financial services industry into a public utility managed by the Federal government. Call it a gift of maximum unknown expectations filled with every disincentive not to take risks.
So what was it Pelosi was expecting the banks to do once they paid back their “bail out” money - resuscitate the sub-prime mortgage industry, spin the risk out again into derivatives and support Federal money to “affordable housing” organizers like ACORN?
That is the essential complaint of Pelosi and Obumer. “The banks” (not their stock holders, not their depositors) were “bailed out” and now the banks are not contributing to Mr. Obama’s socialized economic agenda, by putting money back into chasing after Marxist social agendas, instead of looking for value on return of capital put to risk.
No, Pelosi and Obumer have made looking ahead for the next few years riskier and far less certain than anyone could have, and after they created that uncertainty “Wall Street” is too blame for their reticence to buy into it.
She’s still lying about the spitting incident that never happened.
“I didn’t hear him say anything when the Tea Party was out demonstrating, actually spitting on members of Congress right here in the Capitol,” Pelosi said.
They just keep telling this lie and nobody calls them on it! Incredible!
Bailouts which she (and a majority of Democrats in both houses) voted for!
Which she will NEVER EVER mention.
Nor the fact that they keep voting for bailouts to this very day.
Pelosi has absolutely convinced her pea brain that the spitting incident occurred, altho there is no evidence on any video from that day & place.
She is as delusional or worse than Barry the Imposter.
Question. Did Miss Nancy vote in the House to bail out the banks? Did Miss Nancy vote in favor of the war against Afghanistan and/or Iraq? Did Miss Nancy support the Bush initiatives to resolve financial problems in the past?
Sorry, Miss Nancy, but before you have ANY credibility, you have a few questions to answer.
Tell us again, Nancy, how you weren’t in favor of these bailouts.