Posted on 10/03/2011 7:58:01 PM PDT by Eagle911
He was convicted and sentenced to 30 years. Then the prosecutor approached him with a deal to knock half of that time off in return for testimony against Knox and Sollecito.
Not quite. He was called to testify, but asserted his right to say nothing (as he has all along).
Knox and Sollecito were charged before his involvment was known, and convicted without testimony from him.
Rudy Hermann Guede: Amanda Knox And Ex-Boyfriend Are The Killers
PERUGIA, Italy — A man convicted of murdering a British exchange student testified Monday that he believes her roommate, Amanda Knox, and her ex-boyfriend killed her – an accusation that prompted an emotional denial from Knox.
It doesn't alter that all convicted were convicted and sentenced, before and without any input from Guede
Knox and Sollecito were charged before his involvment was known, and convicted without testimony from him.
You still have not explained why a so called scared and stupid kid had to frame a innocent man who had to go to jail because of that.
You are ignoring the multitude of lies and deceit and consistent pattern of psychotic behaviour which shows the work of a dark and disturbed mind rather than someone who is innocent.
The confused killer did not work alone, it is clear that she and her boyfriend were involved. You may trust liars, I dont. Get real. People like you are easily conned.
Heavy and repeated use of M A R I J U A N A can alter the addicts mind and cause pyschotic behaviour.
Despite what liberals claim it is neither safe nor harmless.
You would gladly lock her up for decades despite the evidence that she is innocent of the charge of murder.
You’ve watched “Reefer Madness” too many times.
I am not saying that she is absolutely guilty of the crime. I am convinced that she and her boyfriend have some level of involvement or were accomplices in the crime. You are trusting someone who is a proven liar and it reflects badly on yourself.
You’ve watched “Midnight Express” too many times.
What is the case is "the bloody footprints" weren't made by blood but by something else that also triggers lumisol. This story IS NOT PART OF THE EVIDENCE. It was totally discredited some time ago.
I'd say that's a mighty poor reflection on you.
You are claiming she is totally innocent, you trust someone who is proven serial liar and a slanderer, it is clear that you have low personal standards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.