Pinch-faced delusional kook!!
Speaking of impeachment, could there be any possibility of a Torricelli/Lautenberg situation developing? Say zer0 is not primaried, is nominated, and then is impeached. Now, of course the SC is not like the NJSC... but would the republican be unopposed? Would a court say that the ‘rats not having a nominee would be an “unfair advantage” to the republican nominee?
You could make the case that O’bummmer is a combatant, in more ways than one. Who gets to press the ‘Fire’ missile button?
It’s called a civil war because it’s a ‘civil’ war not a foreign military action.
I am glad Ron Paul said something about this because no one else did. After the fact, most figureheads agreed with the killings although they have no idea who in entirely they killed (ended with just a red spot on the ground). What a way to run a country. Either you practice the rule-of-law or you don’t.
But there’s no way the current senate would vote to convict. Republicans would have to run the table and pick up 20 of 23 seats up next year to have a straight party vote for conviction. Of course if we picked up even half that many seats, it’s quite unlikely Obama would be reelected too. Perhaps there are good reasons for impeaching and removing a lame duck Obama in the 17 days between the swearing in of the 113th Congress and the swearing in of the next president, but it would look rather vindictive. I would like to see all the czars impeached and removed though.