Skip to comments.
Mitch Daniels: Obama not a socialist
The Hill ^
| 09/23/11
| Cameron Joseph
Posted on 09/23/2011 12:39:50 PM PDT by freespirited
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: ZULU
Goodie. As if the current RINO field needs two more RINOs.
41
posted on
09/23/2011 1:03:24 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(Rick Perry has more red flags than a May Day Parade)
To: freespirited
Romney said it best, Mitch: Nice Try.
42
posted on
09/23/2011 1:04:55 PM PDT
by
tenger
(It's a good thing we don't get all the government we pay for. -Will Rogers)
To: freespirited
At some stage I just think that if youre interested in results you should just try to be careful to use words that dont drive anybody away and if possible just take a chance to be more civil, more likeable than the other guy, said Daniels, who added that he did not see Thursdays debate. Thank you, 19th Amendment!
To: MrB
Yes, apparently Mitch Daniels is the exception. Pure RINO!
44
posted on
09/23/2011 1:06:33 PM PDT
by
Paperdoll
(NO MORE RINOs)
To: freespirited
Now if Daniels can prove he isn’t an idiot, that might prove to be difficult.
45
posted on
09/23/2011 1:07:10 PM PDT
by
SERE_DOC
(My Rice Krispies told me to stay home & clean my weapons!)
To: Jim Scott
Thank you, thank you, Jim Scott.
46
posted on
09/23/2011 1:07:22 PM PDT
by
donhunt
(Certified and proud "Son of a Bitch".)
To: freespirited
Who pulled the runts chain.
47
posted on
09/23/2011 1:07:48 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(so Perry's purchase price starts at $5001.00: and $29,000 , was a sell.)
To: freespirited
Who pulled the runts chain.
48
posted on
09/23/2011 1:08:12 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(so Perry's purchase price starts at $5001.00: and $29,000 , was a sell.)
To: freespirited
I agree 100% with Mitch!
BUT, my tagline still applies 100% as well...
49
posted on
09/23/2011 1:09:02 PM PDT
by
C210N
(0bama, Making the US safe for Global Marxism)
To: Jeff Head
To: freespirited
Even Obama is scratchin’ his head over this!
51
posted on
09/23/2011 1:13:58 PM PDT
by
albie
To: RobbyS
“Obama is a social Democrat...”
Yes. And it’s worth recalling that the Lenin’s Bolsheviks sprang from the Russian Social-Democratic Workers’ Party.
European social-democratic and labor parties are explicitly and unabashedly socialist. Barack won’t call himself a socialist and MSM opinion leaders criticize anybody who makes such an assertion because Americans think that they do not like socialism.
To: freespirited
53
posted on
09/23/2011 1:17:25 PM PDT
by
LZ_Bayonet
( I AM THE TEA PARTY LEADER !)
To: henkster
Obamunism is a unique school of economic thought. It combines the worst features of both socialism and fascism.
To: freespirited
Elect Rick Perry or Mitt Romney and you will get more of the same from the GOP.
Enough is enough already!
55
posted on
09/23/2011 1:18:23 PM PDT
by
CSI007
(re)
To: freespirited
So, is Daniels a fool or a scoundrel?
56
posted on
09/23/2011 1:19:45 PM PDT
by
dsc
(Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
To: freespirited
Marxist
57
posted on
09/23/2011 1:22:15 PM PDT
by
aMorePerfectUnion
(You know, 99.99999965% of the lawyers give all of them a bad name)
To: freespirited
Here in CA I work and live next to people that are proud to say they are socialists. Us conservatives may think it’s an insult, but to them it’s a compliment.
To: Jeff Head
59
posted on
09/23/2011 1:44:38 PM PDT
by
Pagey
(B. Hussein Obama has no experience running anything, except his pedestrian mouth.)
To: Skepolitic
I must disagree. Kurt Schumacher—the leader of the SPD in West Germany after WW2 was a marxist and a socialist. But in the ‘60s, the SPD repudiated most of Marx’s more radical notions, including the kid of nationalization that happened in Britain 1945-50. But They all are very much in a consolidated state. Even the “Christian” parties are statists, although they base their welfare state more of benevolence than the redistribution of wealth. The weakness of the churches in Germany is based on there willingness to let the state organize social services than do it themselves.
60
posted on
09/23/2011 1:45:05 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
(Pray with the suffering souls.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson