Posted on 09/16/2011 7:42:42 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
"If we wish to be free, if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending, if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained, we must fight!"-- Patrick Henry
Today in America, we are surrendering our culture to a religious foreign culture. Ibelieve that if you value something, fight for it or you will certainly lose it.!
Remember Patrick Henry when he said, “If we wish to be free, we must fight!”
"[W]here is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths...?" -- George Washington, Farewell Address"Oaths in this country are as yet universally considered as sacred obligations." -- John Adams
"The sum of all is, if we would most truly enjoy the gift of Heaven, let us become a virtuous people; then shall we both deserve and enjoy it. While, on the other hand, if we are universally vicious and debauched in our manners, though the form of our Constitution carries the face of the most exalted freedom, we shall in reality be the most abject slaves."-- Samuel Adams
John Adams statement is outdated according to our increasingly progressive liberal judicial system.
When Christians abandon their faith, as so many appear to be doing today, we might as well toss the Constitution into the pail with yesterdays New York Times newspaper. Neither of them carry the weight with our populace they once did.
Well, we better get busy then raising up representatives who understand their oath, beginning with its sacred nature.
Because that is the only hope for this free republic.
The difference, if any, a century, or two, makes...
And have them do what?
That’s a cool map.
Okay, listen up.
This is the SECOND Constitution (it is taken from above):
Amendment XIV
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Do you know why? Because it is REDUNDANT. And it is an axiom of law that you cannot have two laws that say the same thing. Because if you do, then you do not have a single point of ground from which your determinations can be based.
So it is another axiom of law that whenever a redundancy is found, it must be eliminated. A decision must be made as to which to keep, and the other must be destroyed.
Given that, look again at this first clause of the 14th Amendment. Notice its redundancy with the rest of the Constitution. And yet, when the Supreme Court was asked to rule on this issue, they declared it was NOT redundant.
How was this ruling possible?
Because they ruled that this Section addressed a DIFFERENT "citizen of the United States" than the rest of the Consititution!
Specifically, a "corporate citizen." A "citizen" that is somehow "created" by this act of Congress, even though it seems to be a human being. A "citizen" which, therefore, has no rights - only "privileges" the government allows it.
Or doesn't allow it.
Thus, this particular clause, of this particular Amendment, and the Supreme Court rulings that defined it, established the existence of something ALIEN to the original Constitution, but which uses ALL THE SAME NAMES AND CONCEPTS as the Constitution - so as to remain hidden in plain sight.
That done, there was only one tiny step left - but necessary. Because the government knew no one would voluntarily accept this "status," the Courts had to make one additional ruling: that the government can PRESUME anyone HAS chosen this status, and that once that presumption is made, said person has to prove they didn't.
Oh yeah, and there's even two further things the courts did: 1st, the ruled that the government doesn't have to tell you this presumption has ever been made.
And 2nd, that the courts don't have to recognize any natural human persons anymore - that they could not sit only as 14th Amendment courts and deal only with "corporate persons" for EVERYTHING (and that's why, for one example, no one can get any "standing" against Obama).
And in that way, the Original Constitution of the united States of America was rolled up, tied neatly, and put on a shelf, in favor of... what we have today.
And that's the secret.
P.S. Now you know why so many politicians and lawyers studied "Constitutional Law." They were studying THIS - and NOT what you thought they were studying.
And 2nd, that the courts don't have to recognize any natural human persons anymore (and not tell you about it) - that they COULD sit ONLY as 14th Amendment courts and deal ONLY with "corporate persons" for EVERYTHING (and that's why, for one example, no one can get any "standing" against Obama).
I’ve heard that stuff before, and consider it to be a load of hooey.
Yeah. I stumbled across that earlier and thought so too.
New tagline ...
-- Cable Guy
Love it.
Great quote!
yes.it.is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.