Posted on 09/13/2011 12:03:52 PM PDT by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief
...the 6th is silly,
Respectlfully disagree. The sixth being an Ohio River Valley contingent district makes economic sense. Much of the district provides goods and services to the mineral and timber extraction, refining, and waterways transportation industries. And with the exception of the northeast sector, is wholly without an efficient highway transportation system linking sections of the district.
Cheers,
OLA
The 6th is this long narrow district that stretches nearly the entire length of the state. That appears contrived to me.
I would have a computer find contiguous population clusters of the amount of people required to be in each congressional district with the shortest distance possible from one side of a district to the other.. There are clustering analyses available.
River centric is both a blessing and a curse. The Ohio River is our main highway; it's possible to travel by boat and visit most of the district. Worst part of sixth district being the long ground travel distances without the benefit of a divided highway system. For example, no where within Lawrence County does a posted highway speed exceed 55 mph.
Contrived? In reality, a district of shared concerns could be stretched west among river counties to Cincinnati. The oddest fit being the district's northerly sector of Youngstown metro juxtaposed against the remainder of the region; population within some of Youngstown precincts exceeds the total population of Lawrence County. Aside from historic footnotes of long past metallurgic ages, this Youngstown region shares little in common with Ironton.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.