Skip to comments.
The Next 9/11 — A Nuclear One?
IBD Editorials ^
| September 9, 2011
| Staff
Posted on 09/09/2011 5:22:26 PM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
1
posted on
09/09/2011 5:22:27 PM PDT
by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
Read the book “One Second After” — a novel. Not the greatest writing in the world, but a very compelling book.
2
posted on
09/09/2011 5:24:36 PM PDT
by
Jerrybob
To: Kaslin
It’s likely just a matter of time. We may stop them a few times, but eventually they’ll get one through.
3
posted on
09/09/2011 5:28:58 PM PDT
by
Ramius
(Or getrsonally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Kaslin
It would need a hydrogen bomb and a very powerful booster, and it would not cripple the U.S. ability to respond, since most of the U.S. military force would be under the sea or over the horizon from the EMP.
4
posted on
09/09/2011 5:31:48 PM PDT
by
GAB-1955
(I write books, love my wife, serve my nation, and believe in the Resurrection.)
To: Kaslin
This is why I’m such a Luddite. We are WAY too dependent on electronic toys.
5
posted on
09/09/2011 5:32:31 PM PDT
by
A_perfect_lady
(Islam is as Islam does.)
To: Kaslin
I think the Iranian fleet would sink before they got close enough to launch an EMP.
6
posted on
09/09/2011 5:34:21 PM PDT
by
mountainlion
(I am voting for Sarah after getting screwed again by the DC Thugs.)
To: Kaslin
It's the same sort of fear that existed in the 1930s with the introduction of large bombers. The bomber would always get through, but it would not hit the target it was supposed to hit. It's the same thing with this fear. If Iran wants to destroy the U.S., not merely cripple it, it would need several hundred bombs and launchers. Meanwhile, Iran would be reduced to trinitite.
7
posted on
09/09/2011 5:34:21 PM PDT
by
GAB-1955
(I write books, love my wife, serve my nation, and believe in the Resurrection.)
To: Kaslin
I’m more worried about the plethora of conventional arms that are pouring onto the Black Market from places like Libya....
8
posted on
09/09/2011 5:35:09 PM PDT
by
Bean Counter
(Obama got mostly Ds and Fs all through college and law school. Keep repeating it.....)
To: GAB-1955
But the issue is “respond against whom?” Ultimately we might be able to discover who sent the nuke but that could take lots of time and you would want to be damned sure you had the right people identified.
9
posted on
09/09/2011 5:35:50 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(So much stress was put on Bush's Fault that it finally let go, magnitude 6)
To: NonValueAdded
Follow the rocket course! Follow the ship! We can and do do both!
10
posted on
09/09/2011 5:38:41 PM PDT
by
GAB-1955
(I write books, love my wife, serve my nation, and believe in the Resurrection.)
To: Cindy; Velveeta; WestCoastGal; LucyT; MamaDearest
One of our biggest fears on the “Threat Matrix” threads.
To: mountainlion; All
Iran is building missile sites in Valenzuela which will put the eastern half of the US within range.
They’ve also orbited a 60kg payload, which would allow them to put that 60kg anywhere they want.
12
posted on
09/09/2011 5:42:08 PM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Bean Counter
To: GAB-1955
“If Iran wants to destroy the U.S., not merely cripple it, it would need several hundred bombs and launchers.”
It needs 3 bombs and the ability to detonate them at the proper altitude and location.
“Meanwhile, Iran would be reduced to trinitite.”
Its an acceptable tradeoff for their leaders.
14
posted on
09/09/2011 5:44:10 PM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: driftdiver
Where the hell is Valenzuela?
To: Jerrybob
Yes it is. The rather banal writing adds to the impact of a pretty detailed description of the US returning to a circa 1900 technology base.
To: Kaslin
Even if Iran didn't use a domestically developed system, it has been reported that Russia sells a “missile in a box” system that could be adapted. As I remember this system, it is something like a scud in a cargo container. Such a system could get off the US coast easily. The real issue is when Iran has a warhead that is sufficiently miniaturized that could be fitted to such a delivery system.
17
posted on
09/09/2011 5:47:52 PM PDT
by
Truth29
To: driftdiver
I have heard glowing reports on our reprisals not to mention defense.
18
posted on
09/09/2011 5:47:52 PM PDT
by
mountainlion
(I am voting for Sarah after getting screwed again by the DC Thugs.)
To: certrtwngnut
Its close to the country where Shavez is the leader.
19
posted on
09/09/2011 5:48:49 PM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Truth29
Remote pilot the falsely flagged cargo ship, launch, scuttle vessel.
20
posted on
09/09/2011 5:51:28 PM PDT
by
wally_bert
(It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson