Posted on 09/03/2011 2:50:53 PM PDT by Publius804
In fact, the allowing of this will only serve to attract homosexual deviants into the military. And just as the Catholic Church has discovered to its dismay, homosexual perverts cannot restrain themselves as normal men do. Whatever these twisted pigs infiltrate, they will try to bring down to their level, and destroy it. DANG it is hard to watch our nation destroy itself from within.
When they choose to out themselves as perverts, that’s enough of a red flag. I am not going to presume that they DON’T have deviant designs on others, including children.
The homo agenda is already prevalent in schools, so obviously it is an important goal to get to and corrupt the children. This in itself is child molestation, because the children’s minds are being molested.
Our society has a million camels’ noses under the tent, yet a good portion of the tent-dwellers are content not to assume anything more than a casual sniff. Worse, many expect or demand that others see no risk.
Check out the article below, it ties a lot of loose ends together. Especially pedophilia and homosexuality.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2773024/posts
Sexual Anarchy
Townhall.com ^ | September 3, 2011 | Matt Barber
Does this happen often or just occasionally?
Dunno. It happened to a soldier I know. He’s now back in the war zone ... so please pray for him. He gave me the impression that some gay soldiers knew that a revocation of DADT was coming, so they could do what they wanted.
Good they are giving a list of who to avoid.
but that's what you get when your military becomes mercenary....
Accessorize, accessorize, accessorize. Those boots are faaaabulous.
we better get our act together....
I am assuming now that we have a majority in Congress that the pubs will find and appoint strong minded men into the academies...
we need a new breed of leaders that's for sure...
DADT repeal...putting the “Unnngh!” in gung-ho.
>>> What is the use of “Barf Alert?”
It’s primary function has little to do with the article directly but mostly serves as a bright waving flag for the poster to advertise his or her righteousness.
Barf Alert translates to “Hey guys I don’t like what these people in the article are doing/saying/thinking/or just their looks so much I feel obligated to you to advertise this in the topic itself instead of waiting for you to click and read what I might actually comment. Aren’t I special.”
Here’s some reasons why homosexuals in the military are not a good thing.
Senate Testimony: European Militaries Are Not Role Models for U.S.
The Center for Military Readiness ^ | 3/22/2010
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608228/posts
Rates of Homosexual Assault in the Military Are Disproportionately High
FRC ^
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608306/posts
In Support the 1993 Law Stating that Homosexuals are not Eligible to Serve in the Military
CMR ^ | July 23, 2008 | Elaine Donnelly
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608370/posts
Has Homosexuality Always Been Incompatible With Military Service?
WallBuilders ^ | David Barton
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1613341/posts
Homosexual Assault in the Military
Family Reserch Council ^ | Peter Sprigg
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608193/posts
>>>> new recruiting ad showing sailors from “America’s Navy” handing out baloney sandwiches to “The Hungry” and bottled water to “The Thirsty”. Saving the planet one baloney sandwich at a time.
The Army ad: We shovel more baloney before breakfast than most people do all day.
>>> pix of all those silly savages in their turquoise blue combat boots.
Just the Air Force.
I thought I already covered this adequately just as I also said I retracted the statement because it added nothing to the discussion.
The idea that the military would end its long-standing policy against open homosexual behavior is objectionable enough, but to then promote said behavior as a healthy lifestyle with this magazine in the exchange is truly “barf-worthy”.
It’s triple bagger projectile nonstop barfing bile alert.
Makes me less apt to support the military (at least the brass & policies)..
LOL. Well, I was trying to back away from that. But, seeing how you stated that so eloquently, I might have to retract my retraction. :-D
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.