Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MoD urged to buy cheaper Navy jets (UK)
Portsmouth.co.uk ^ | 2 August 2011 | Michael Powell

Posted on 08/02/2011 8:43:34 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 08/02/2011 8:43:36 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The Brits are building two new aircraft carriers?


2 posted on 08/02/2011 8:49:10 AM PDT by RexBeach (Mr. Obama can't count.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Hmmm. Who else makes naval aircraft, I wonder?

Maybe they’d like to go for the F/A-18? Or a navalized MiG-29s or SU-27?


3 posted on 08/02/2011 8:49:48 AM PDT by Little Ray (Best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
The new Queen Elizabeth class carrier.
4 posted on 08/02/2011 8:56:05 AM PDT by mgstarr ("Some of us drink because we're not poets." Arthur (1981))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

‘The argument is like saying: “I haven’t got enough money to buy a Porsche 911 right now so I’ll buy an Audi TT instead,’” said a source

Well, an Audi would probably lose a race to a Porsche.
Not a serious outcome for cars, but losing an aerial battle would be a serious one for a combat flyer.

Second best will still go down in flames,
pilot skill being equal.


5 posted on 08/02/2011 9:00:40 AM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

Current estimated cost of these POS is 235 million each and 65,000 an hour to fly. As a tax payer, the answer for buying this crap is not no, but hell no.


6 posted on 08/02/2011 9:07:58 AM PDT by org.whodat (What does the Republican party stand for////??? absolutely nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Lads, always remember that all your equipment was built by the lowest bidder.


7 posted on 08/02/2011 9:14:33 AM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr
If the Brits are looking for cheap carrier capable aircraft, order the MiG-29K (Fulcrum D) and Su-33 (Flanker D). The MiG-29K is in production for the Indian Navy as well as Russian Naval Aviation. It is smaller than the Su-33.

Now, if the Brits really want a cheap version of the Su-33, then they should buy the Shenyang J-15, a Chinese knockoff of the Su-33 for their “new” carrier SHI LANG (Russian ex-VARYAG). While the Brits are at it, they can get some deals on very capable Kamov Helix helicopters to replace the expensive Euro designs.

8 posted on 08/02/2011 9:21:39 AM PDT by MasterGunner01 (To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Actually the cost for the carrier variant (F-35C) is 135 Million. It's still a lot of money, but nowhere near 235 million. In addition, this argument is presented every time there is a new aircraft. "It's too Expensive". "It's unreliable". All new aircraft are going to have reliability issues initially. All new airframes that push the envelope for performance, stealth, and avionics are going to be expensive.

Although the F-18s are good aircraft, they were developed back in the early 80s and are thirty year old technology. There's only so much you can do to improve them. The competition is getting much better and the F-18 is no longer a dominant air to air fighter. The lack of stealth makes it vulnerable to surface to air missiles.

At best the F-18s are an expensive short term fix that would only delay the purchase of the more capable aircraft somewhere down the road.

9 posted on 08/02/2011 9:24:01 AM PDT by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mbynack
Call ding bat Juan McCain and tell him the money already pissed away is not part of the cost. LOL, They are not worth the money at 10 million a copy. The last I read the air force wants no new manned jets, unless they are cargo
10 posted on 08/02/2011 9:31:37 AM PDT by org.whodat (What does the Republican party stand for////??? absolutely nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Bring back the Fairly Swordfishes. I'll wager they already have a squadron 'hanging' around various museums in the UK and elsewhere. Yup, the old Stringbags' could bring us through.

After all, the only possible opponents we would face would be muslims, who can't fly worth a sh*t. Just ask the undefeated Israeli Air Force! HaHaHaHa! Fully half of muslim 'COMBAT' air force fatalities were caused by pilot error. Read that sentence carefully again before commenting!

11 posted on 08/02/2011 9:52:08 AM PDT by STD ('Be Ye holy, for I am holy')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The F-35C is a cheaper option than paying for the development of the Eurofighter Naval Variant.

Chances are that the F-35C will also be close to, if not cheaper than, off the shelf Rafale Naval Variants.

However, Britain is close to striking a joint operations deal with France, whereby both navies will fly off of each other's ships.

If they really do this, then Rafale is the most logical choice for the RN.

12 posted on 08/02/2011 9:54:59 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

The naval Typhoon is likely to remain a powerpoint presentation unless the Brits decide that they do not want catapults.


13 posted on 08/02/2011 11:53:15 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

Yes we are.

Has been public for some time. Finished around 2018 supposedly.


14 posted on 08/02/2011 12:11:05 PM PDT by the scotsman (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

Great!

Nice to see they’re not going to be jump=jet birdfarms.

Good looking ships.

Cheers, mate!


15 posted on 08/02/2011 12:13:35 PM PDT by RexBeach (Mr. Obama can't count.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]



Boop His Tiny Tail!

Can you believe those itty bitty claws
will soon be six inches long?


Don't let the left get out of hand
Donate, monthly if possible

Sponsoring FReepers will contribute $10
For each New Monthly Donor

16 posted on 08/02/2011 12:25:33 PM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01
If the Brits are looking for cheap carrier capable aircraft, order the MiG-29K (Fulcrum D) and Su-33 (Flanker D). The MiG-29K is in production for the Indian Navy as well as Russian Naval Aviation. It is smaller than the Su-33.

That leaves them depending on the Russians for spares and helping the Russian economy instead of our.

17 posted on 08/02/2011 12:33:58 PM PDT by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01
If the Brits are looking for cheap carrier capable aircraft, order the MiG-29K (Fulcrum D) and Su-33 (Flanker D). The MiG-29K is in production for the Indian Navy as well as Russian Naval Aviation. It is smaller than the Su-33.

That leaves them depending on the Russians for spares and helping the Russian economy instead of ours.

18 posted on 08/02/2011 12:34:10 PM PDT by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

ping


19 posted on 08/02/2011 3:25:00 PM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; investigateworld; lowbuck; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings.

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.

20 posted on 08/02/2011 3:52:13 PM PDT by magslinger (Senator Olo Hamwich of Buckleberry Fern (RINO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson