Skip to comments.
MoD urged to buy cheaper Navy jets (UK)
Portsmouth.co.uk ^
| 2 August 2011
| Michael Powell
Posted on 08/02/2011 8:43:34 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: sukhoi-30mki
The Brits are building two new aircraft carriers?
2
posted on
08/02/2011 8:49:10 AM PDT
by
RexBeach
(Mr. Obama can't count.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Hmmm. Who else makes naval aircraft, I wonder?
Maybe they’d like to go for the F/A-18? Or a navalized MiG-29s or SU-27?
3
posted on
08/02/2011 8:49:48 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(Best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
To: RexBeach

The new Queen Elizabeth class carrier.
4
posted on
08/02/2011 8:56:05 AM PDT
by
mgstarr
("Some of us drink because we're not poets." Arthur (1981))
To: sukhoi-30mki
The argument is like saying: I havent got enough money to buy a Porsche 911 right now so Ill buy an Audi TT instead, said a source
Well, an Audi would probably lose a race to a Porsche.
Not a serious outcome for cars, but losing an aerial battle would be a serious one for a combat flyer.
Second best will still go down in flames,
pilot skill being equal.
To: RitchieAprile
Current estimated cost of these POS is 235 million each and 65,000 an hour to fly. As a tax payer, the answer for buying this crap is not no, but hell no.
6
posted on
08/02/2011 9:07:58 AM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What does the Republican party stand for////??? absolutely nothing.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Lads, always remember that all your equipment was built by the lowest bidder.
7
posted on
08/02/2011 9:14:33 AM PDT
by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: mgstarr
If the Brits are looking for cheap carrier capable aircraft, order the MiG-29K (Fulcrum D) and Su-33 (Flanker D). The MiG-29K is in production for the Indian Navy as well as Russian Naval Aviation. It is smaller than the Su-33.
Now, if the Brits really want a cheap version of the Su-33, then they should buy the Shenyang J-15, a Chinese knockoff of the Su-33 for their “new” carrier SHI LANG (Russian ex-VARYAG). While the Brits are at it, they can get some deals on very capable Kamov Helix helicopters to replace the expensive Euro designs.
8
posted on
08/02/2011 9:21:39 AM PDT
by
MasterGunner01
(To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
To: org.whodat
Actually the cost for the carrier variant (F-35C) is 135 Million. It's still a lot of money, but nowhere near 235 million. In addition, this argument is presented every time there is a new aircraft. "It's too Expensive". "It's unreliable". All new aircraft are going to have reliability issues initially. All new airframes that push the envelope for performance, stealth, and avionics are going to be expensive.
Although the F-18s are good aircraft, they were developed back in the early 80s and are thirty year old technology. There's only so much you can do to improve them. The competition is getting much better and the F-18 is no longer a dominant air to air fighter. The lack of stealth makes it vulnerable to surface to air missiles.
At best the F-18s are an expensive short term fix that would only delay the purchase of the more capable aircraft somewhere down the road.
9
posted on
08/02/2011 9:24:01 AM PDT
by
mbynack
(Retired USAF SMSgt)
To: mbynack
Call ding bat Juan McCain and tell him the money already pissed away is not part of the cost. LOL, They are not worth the money at 10 million a copy. The last I read the air force wants no new manned jets, unless they are cargo
10
posted on
08/02/2011 9:31:37 AM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What does the Republican party stand for////??? absolutely nothing.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Bring back the Fairly Swordfishes. I'll wager they already have a squadron 'hanging' around various museums in the UK and elsewhere. Yup, the old Stringbags' could bring us through.
After all, the only possible opponents we would face would be muslims, who can't fly worth a sh*t. Just ask the undefeated Israeli Air Force! HaHaHaHa! Fully half of muslim 'COMBAT' air force fatalities were caused by pilot error. Read that sentence carefully again before commenting!
11
posted on
08/02/2011 9:52:08 AM PDT
by
STD
('Be Ye holy, for I am holy')
To: sukhoi-30mki
The F-35C is a cheaper option than paying for the development of the Eurofighter Naval Variant.
Chances are that the F-35C will also be close to, if not cheaper than, off the shelf Rafale Naval Variants.
However, Britain is close to striking a joint operations deal with France, whereby both navies will fly off of each other's ships.
If they really do this, then Rafale is the most logical choice for the RN.
12
posted on
08/02/2011 9:54:59 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Yo-Yo
The naval Typhoon is likely to remain a powerpoint presentation unless the Brits decide that they do not want catapults.
To: RexBeach
Yes we are.
Has been public for some time. Finished around 2018 supposedly.
To: the scotsman
Great!
Nice to see they’re not going to be jump=jet birdfarms.
Good looking ships.
Cheers, mate!
15
posted on
08/02/2011 12:13:35 PM PDT
by
RexBeach
(Mr. Obama can't count.)

Boop His Tiny Tail!
Can you believe those itty bitty claws
will soon be six inches long?
Don't let the left get out of hand
Donate, monthly if possible
Sponsoring FReepers will contribute $10
For each New Monthly Donor
16
posted on
08/02/2011 12:25:33 PM PDT
by
TheOldLady
(FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.)
To: MasterGunner01
If the Brits are looking for cheap carrier capable aircraft, order the MiG-29K (Fulcrum D) and Su-33 (Flanker D). The MiG-29K is in production for the Indian Navy as well as Russian Naval Aviation. It is smaller than the Su-33. That leaves them depending on the Russians for spares and helping the Russian economy instead of our.
17
posted on
08/02/2011 12:33:58 PM PDT
by
mbynack
(Retired USAF SMSgt)
To: MasterGunner01
If the Brits are looking for cheap carrier capable aircraft, order the MiG-29K (Fulcrum D) and Su-33 (Flanker D). The MiG-29K is in production for the Indian Navy as well as Russian Naval Aviation. It is smaller than the Su-33. That leaves them depending on the Russians for spares and helping the Russian economy instead of ours.
18
posted on
08/02/2011 12:34:10 PM PDT
by
mbynack
(Retired USAF SMSgt)
To: magslinger
To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; investigateworld; lowbuck; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings.
Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.
20
posted on
08/02/2011 3:52:13 PM PDT
by
magslinger
(Senator Olo Hamwich of Buckleberry Fern (RINO))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson