Posted on 07/12/2011 3:50:54 PM PDT by wagglebee
Put a coil in Harry Truman’s grave, and you could power Manhattan for a month.
Excessive spending is not pro-gay.
Sadly, we do not have solidarity - liberals, progressives, communists, most media, some clergy, etc. are all against us.
When I first glanced at the thread title I thought it said “Obama: my administration is most gay in history”.
LOL!
“Sadly, we do not have solidarity - liberals, progressives, communists, most media, some clergy, etc. are all against us.”
These people are going to regret that,We keep this place going,weather they like it or not, we call the shots in the end!
Despite the media overuse of a certain word, no one could call that statement from Obama "unexpected".
Pro gay. Gee I wonder why?
“Any republican that thinks they can get more than a handful of gay voters is not facing the facts.”
Well, of course. And the “Log Cabin Republicans”? Puleez. But I’ve heard several times lately that, despite the media’s and Hollywood’s propaganda, the real number of gays in America is only 2-3%. Wow - really? I’d like to believe that, for many reasons. Our poor kids are sure being indoctrinated by the Left that it’s the cool and “in” thing to be (or at least experiment with).
“Why was that NOT brought up back in the campaign By McCain or anybody really?”
Are you kidding? So many reasons. McCain’s a puss and so afraid of being called (or perceived as) racist that he acted as one of BHO’s biggest cheerleaders. Idiot. And as far as anyone else? Who was gonna dare to rain on the “exciting prospect” of our first black president, especially one so charismatic, attractive and articulate, who represented “how far we’d come as a country”?
Now, however, we’ve been there, done that and the bloom is off his rose - big time. Wouldn’t it be fun, though, if and when we have a nominee Cain or West, to repeatedly throw the race card back at the Rats?
““The One” is a registered trademark of Harpo Productions of the Really Fabulous New Age, LLC, all hail Oprah.”
So THAT’S why he picked Stedman Graham as his attorney general! LOL
http://bradley1969.blogspot.com/2008/12/separated-at-birth-eric-holder-stedman.html
“Why was that NOT brought up back in the campaign By McCain or anybody really?”
Are you kidding? So many reasons. McCain’s a puss and so afraid of being called (or perceived as) racist that he acted as one of BHO’s biggest cheerleaders. Idiot. And as far as anyone else? Who was gonna dare to rain on the “exciting prospect” of our first black president, especially one so charismatic, attractive and articulate, who represented “how far we’d come as a country”?
Now, however, we’ve been there, done that and the bloom is off his rose - big time. Wouldn’t it be fun, though, if and when we have a nominee Cain or West, to repeatedly throw the race card back at the Rats?”
Obamas background was well known,shame we had a traitor and the very person who split the party with his and Kennedy’s Amnesty ,that is exactly how the Rats took the mid terms in 06 and the missing voters, needed stop this communist shuffling bastard in 08.
“Obamas background was well known”
I agree with your reply except for this part. Unfortunately, his background was NOT well-known unless you listened to conservative talk radio, read FR, or watched Fox News - Hannity in particular, who hammered on this daily for months and months before the election. The rest of the media was complicit in sugar-coating and, for the most part, downright covering up BHO’s unsavory background and connections. I know most of his koolaid drinkers would probably not have cared, but there were scores of decent Americans who would have but simply weren’t exposed to the facts and truth about b. hussein.
I’d been learning about him for at least a year and half prior to Nov. ‘08, so even though I was sick at the thought of McLame as our nominee, I was not about to vote for BHO. And I feel the same this time - while I’m working for conservative candidates to win, I’ll vote anyone but BHO.
“Obamas background was well known”
I agree with your reply except for this part. Unfortunately, his background was NOT well-known unless you listened to conservative talk radio, read FR, or watched Fox News - Hannity in particular, who hammered on this daily for months and months before the election. The rest of the media was complicit in sugar-coating and, for the most part, downright covering up BHO’s unsavory background and connections. I know most of his koolaid drinkers would probably not have cared, but there were scores of decent Americans who would have but simply weren’t exposed to the facts and truth about b. hussein.
I’d been learning about him for at least a year and half prior to Nov. ‘08, so even though I was sick at the thought of McLame as our nominee, I was not about to vote for BHO. And I feel the same this time - while I’m working for conservative candidates to win, I’ll vote anyone but BHO.”
You are right,We knew his resume well in here but the public was ignorant on this leftist Bastard.
He wouldn't be the worst gay president. Only Franklin Pierce or maybe Millard Fillmore would have a claim at being worse than James Buchanan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.