Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Losing Canada's Oil to China
NewsMax ^ | 07/02/2011 | Jim Meyers

Posted on 07/03/2011 4:32:52 PM PDT by safetysign

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: trebb
It was with Lula in Brazil. Where we invested in offshore drilling, like we don' t allow our own people to do here at home.
21 posted on 07/03/2011 5:32:02 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat

So its a good thing a potential enemy is getting supplies from a long time friend?


22 posted on 07/03/2011 5:35:05 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: haroldeveryman

“High paying oil industry jobs are not fungible.”

Yes they are as far is if you are qualified, you will have no problem getting an oil field job.


23 posted on 07/03/2011 5:36:02 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

“Oil is fungible. Let the Chinese and Canadians do what they think is best. Let us do what we think is best. As long as oil is being pumped, the market will make it available to any buyer.”

I certainly agree that oil is fungible. However, I disagree with your basic point because Obama is preventing rational action. Private companies want to build a pipeline to transport the oil to Gulf coast refineries. Obama is preventing this allocation of resources, forcing his idiotic choices (higher energy prices and energy shortages) on us. Your point would be valid if private individuals did not want to build the pipeline but Obama forced them to build it.


24 posted on 07/03/2011 5:40:02 PM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz; theBuckwheat; USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Another thought from a comment made by USFRIENDINVICTORIA the other day:

Americans should note that NAFTA prohibits Canada from reducing the proportion of oil and gas that goes to the U.S.A. That guarantees you a supply; so long as we have one. However, if you stop buying as much; then we're not obligated to sell you more, if you change your mind. If certain U.S. ‘greenies’ and politicians have their way, the U.S. would stop buying oil from the oil sands. We would then not be obligated to sell it to you in the future. If this pipeline is built, you'd have to compete in the world market for it. If China has it sewed up in contracts — then that would be that.

25 posted on 07/03/2011 5:41:54 PM PDT by seowulf ("If you write a whole line of zeroes, it's still---nothing"...Kira Alexandrovna Argounova)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor

“Obama is preventing this allocation of resources, forcing his idiotic choices (higher energy prices and energy shortages) on us.”

Right. The jobs arising from the economically rational act of building pipelines that transport Canadian oil add value. Keeping our refineries running creates higher value products. And keeping our technical skills alive during what will be a long period of depressed economic conditions is a matter of survival.


26 posted on 07/03/2011 6:01:08 PM PDT by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

This is not really what’s happening. The existing TransCanada pipeline is waiting for approval for a massive expansion. Obama’s administration is delaying approval until they secure agreement that the west coast pipeline through British Columbia to feed China will be delayed a decade or two.


27 posted on 07/03/2011 6:21:26 PM PDT by spyone (ridiculum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

It’s #793 in the Plan to Destroy America.


28 posted on 07/03/2011 6:35:33 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

In Obama’s heart of hearts he is celebrating the US loss of Canadian oil.


29 posted on 07/03/2011 6:47:29 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat

REad an article about Obama helping expose Israel to attack with canning Bush’s missle defense in Europe, plus supporting the ouster of Mubarak, supporting the Palestiniann state, but not opposing Assad when attacking his civilians. Makes me think that Libya is just a diversionary tactic.

Then, in the midst of all this, he taps the oil reserve, ostensibly to reduce fuel prices after he has done every thing he can think of to raise them. Doesn’t make sense.

The author of the article I read thinks Israel will be attacked in September, after our strategic oil reserve has been run down. Not that Obama would come to Israel’s aid, but if we did, the Arabs would cut off our oil in a heartbeat, our production has been reduced. Sounds to me like preparation for an excuse not to help the Israelis and bring our defenses to its knees with lack of oil. Just thinking ahead. To me, it fits the circumstances. We will see.


30 posted on 07/03/2011 7:11:37 PM PDT by RatRipper (I'll ride a turtle to work every day before I buy anything from Government Motors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Correct, he doesn’t want abundant, cheap oil for U.S. customers because he wants the U.S. to become like socialist Europe with high gas prices and everyone riding public transit.


31 posted on 07/03/2011 7:48:19 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

The Democrats will give their usual canned reply that Canadian oil is somehow “dirty” unlike the nice clean healthy oil we get from Venezuela and Saudi Arabia.


32 posted on 07/03/2011 7:52:21 PM PDT by denydenydeny (Rage all you want, looters & moochers, but the gods of the copybook headings are your masters now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

Yes, Obama, but he’s not alone in that fight. Merchants and free traitors are pushing hard against oil from the tar sands, because it conflict with their interests. Imagine paying extra for the freight fuel and other transportation costs to carry your oil overseas in the near future. That’s what you could avoid by buying it from Canada.

Arnold Schwarzenegger and a horde of other bipartisan California politicos were working hard against the tar sands projects years ago with fake environmentalist arguments. Environmentalism: the contemporary way for globalists to prevent competition.


33 posted on 07/03/2011 8:47:15 PM PDT by familyop (Rome was burned in a day--twice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

And BTW, oil won’t be so “fungible” after the likely wars ahead. Pride goes before the fall. We need to drop baseless pride, reject contemporary propaganda on the economy and foreign relations, and get to real work.


34 posted on 07/03/2011 8:49:48 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in a thunderous avalanche of rottenness smelled around the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

It concerns me that if we should open our oil fields after Obama wrecks our oil supply and our economy with debt and outsourcing, the US will give our oil to the highest bidder or the foreigner they want to buy off, and Americans will be no better off.


35 posted on 07/04/2011 5:53:51 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson