Posted on 06/28/2011 5:11:04 AM PDT by ejdrapes
*rolls eyes*
Sorry, anyone who sees Huntsman as a potential GOP nominee is truly delusional.
He was great at running GE, not so much at politics. To paraphrase, "Shut up and run a company."
:)
So basically you agree with Welch’s assessment? So we should just fold out tents and fall behind one of Welch’s chosen field? Really brilliant.
Point out where she was bashed. I must have missed it.
You see, you make every thread into what it turns out to be.
This poster did not mention Palin at all. He also did not mention Bachmann.
Reading comprehension is your friend.
They can deal with an Obama. For crying out loud, GE does business and prospers in every dictator led hellhole in the world. They know who to buy off.
Check out the post he was responding to, troll. Reading comprehension on FR entails following the conversation. Try it sometime.
Proving once again that Fortune 500 execs don’t know any real conservatives. If the GOP nominates any of these three we lose.
Reality is tough for some to swallow, like those who predicted Obama would win in ‘08. Not because they agree with his agenda, simply because some see the World more realistically than others.
You can continue to get rude and nasty with those who don't like or agree with, but all that will do is reveal more about you than the issue at hand.
You need to take some time off. You really have become unhinged.
GE is essentially a client company of the Federal government.
Post 6: When (if) Sarah Palin announces she is a candidate for President, this campaign will then become SERIOUS!
Post 17 from PDS troll, in response to 6: Not according to Jack Welch.
Yep, Welch doesn't mention either Palin or Bachmann as a serious contender. Yet the PDS troll uses that as a Palin bash. Well, then, if Welch is correct about Palin, then he is also correct about Bachmann?
Like I said, rank hypocrisy. But that's never been an impediment to your gang.
Now, go ahead and insult me and or Palin further. It's the only game you know how to play.
You are kooky.
He said “not according to Jack Welch”
That is not Palin bashing. That is a fact. Jack Welch would not consider Palin or Bachmann serious.
Good grief. Your skin is so thin that I am surprised it is still hanging there.
So tell us who we should coalesce around in your opinion, then.
Rank hypocrites. I don't expect you to recognize such, as you are the biggest PDS troll/hypocrite in the buch. Has nothing to do with a thin skin, and everything to pointing out skunks.
Jack Welch, the same guy who picked Jeff Imelt to succeed him at GE is now trying to pick a Republican nominee. Ah, no thanks Jack.
So then explain 2010.
Just something to think about, folks.
Go back and re-read my last few posts. I acknowledge that that Welch would not consdider Bachmann or Palin serious.
Are you crazy, or are you just a petty little thin skinned whiner who has gotten themself so invested in a politician that you are unable to see the forest through the trees?
Now I am done arguing with a loon.
And was my initial post addressed to you? No. It was addresssed to one of your cohorts.
You just can't debate honestly, can you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.