Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perry: ‘Stand up’ and ‘stop apologizing’
MSNBC ^ | March 18, 2011 | Domenico Montanaro, Political Reporter, NBC News

Posted on 06/18/2011 2:27:03 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Post #10 “If you show up illegally, without your card or you’re here as a criminal element, I’m for throwing the book at those folks, but the issue of people who want to legally, thoughtfully and appropriately come to America to work and help us build our economy — we should quickly come up with a program and an identification card to do that.” [end excerpt]

He's describing a "pathway"/Green Card "McShamnesty" program right under your nose, and you can't/won't smell it.

From bracero to citizen -- and registered Democrat. "Benvenidos a Tejas, mi casa su casa, y recuerda, 'Vota Democratica!' Viva La Raza! Viva la Giente! Abajo los gringos -- oh, wait, I'm a gringo, too. Let me rephrase that ......"

81 posted on 06/18/2011 7:33:08 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
My sainted spouse has been saying for the past week or so that if Perry enters, Palin will endorse him and opt out of running herself. That prognostication is as good as yours or mine at this point.

Interesting prediction ..... thanks. Personally, I've been thinking that if she decided not to enter, she'd probably endorse Michele Bachmann. But I think that it's much more likely she'll enter the race over the July 4th weekend, maybe on the 4th itself, which is a Monday (good spot in the news cycle).

No particular reason for picking July 4th other than the symbolism, but someone speculated on that possibility, and I think it's a good guess. I can't see her waiting too much longer -- Labor Day, say.

The early money for the primaries will commit over the summer, so she needs to be in there. Unlike Fred Thompson, who was restrained in 2007 by contractual obligations to NBC, so he waited until after the new TV season began, and by then it was too late. The money, what there was of it in that starveling GOP political year, was already gone.

82 posted on 06/18/2011 7:47:40 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

No he doesn’t.
He sounded (and acted actually) conservative many years ago. But he hasn’t been for quite some time, not even before an election. Every now and then he’s right, like a broken clock.


83 posted on 06/18/2011 7:57:07 PM PDT by visualops (Proud Air Force Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

Interesting ... love this speculating .. will she or won’t she? When will she, etc?

One FReeper speculated that she’d wait till after 7/26, having to do with peculiar AK laws regarding former office holders’ liabilities, that will expire 7/26. So who knows?

It’s fun, but I really am wasting my life away looking forward to November ‘12


84 posted on 06/18/2011 8:04:00 PM PDT by EDINVA ( CHANGE it back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
But Palin doesn't have to get in for there to be a Perry/Palin ticket, does she?

No, she doesn't, but the likelihood that she would want #2 on the ticket again is slim, in my opinion.

85 posted on 06/18/2011 8:16:46 PM PDT by Wolfstar ("If you would win a man to your cause, first convince him that you are his friend." Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
IIRC McCain was out of money and basically dead in the water after New Hampshire and Iowa. He really never got off the ground running until South Carolina, which means that he was effectively only beginning his campaign in February 2008. He pulled off a come from behind slaughter of the candidates who were left standing.

There are only two reasons why McCain was able to acquire the nomination. The first is that conservatives could not (or would not) rally and unite behind anyone. The second is the open primaries in several key states. McCain essentially backed into the nomination, winning it almost by default. He wasn't effectively beginning his campaign in February. He was resuscitating it.

McCain had been running for president since the late 1990's. He had everything in place except a real constituency in the Republican Party. His constituency, such as it was, was among independents, centrist Dems and lukewarm Reps. Conservatives were not going to support Romney. When Huckabee and everyone else dropped out, who was left?

86 posted on 06/18/2011 8:39:09 PM PDT by Wolfstar ("If you would win a man to your cause, first convince him that you are his friend." Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

McCain was the darling/choice of the new world order (Bush1) and its enablers including the msm and the owners.


87 posted on 06/18/2011 8:48:34 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

Possibly. But there’s a difference between being #2 on a winning ticket and #2 on a losing ticket.

I know there are criticisms of Perry, but I seriously doubt he’ll do the John-McLame-giving-BJs-to-his-lover-Barak thing.

This time, in the #2 spot, she’ll actually end up as VP. And you know one thing the VP gets to do... go up against the press.

And wow, what a perfect place to do THAT from for Sarah, who hates them as much as we all hate them.

... of course I’m just speculating here... but aren’t we all at this point...


88 posted on 06/18/2011 8:50:34 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

Possibly. But there’s a difference between being #2 on a winning ticket and #2 on a losing ticket.

I know there are criticisms of Perry, but I seriously doubt he’ll do the John-McLame-giving-BJs-to-his-lover-Barak thing.

This time, in the #2 spot, she’ll actually end up as VP. And you know one thing the VP gets to do... go up against the press.

And wow, what a perfect place to do THAT from for Sarah, who hates them as much as we all hate them.

... of course I’m just speculating here... but aren’t we all at this point...


89 posted on 06/18/2011 8:51:07 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: allsouthern
We will be giving the left the old BUSH argument back.
That's such BS. The only people stupid enough to fall for that are a few stragglers here in FR. Even the left realizes that just because you come from the same STATE as somebody, you aren't that somebody.

Newsflash, allsouthern: the Bush's campaigned against and hate Perry.

By the way, if Huckabee had been nominated in 2008 would the press had talked about his "Clinton problem"?

Of course not. Because EVEN THE LEFT IS NOT THAT STUPID.

Question, "allsouthern", have you ever BEEN to the south? Or are you a Massachusetts dude with allsouthern-pretensions? Because if you've ever BEEN to the south, or Texas, you'll find that not everyone from the south, or from Texas, is the same.

You should go there sometime. Check it out. (Just a suggestion.)

90 posted on 06/18/2011 8:56:01 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Hey dumba**, I live in Texas!! If you dont think for one minute that the left wont capitalize on something like this then you deserve (along with the GOP) to have your a** handed to you in the general election!!


91 posted on 06/18/2011 9:14:51 PM PDT by allsouthern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
Rubio would not meet Constitutional requirements.

Oh, as if that matters anymore. :^/

92 posted on 06/18/2011 9:48:08 PM PDT by Teacher317 (really?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Governor Perry Signs Gun Bills!
Greetings!

Yesterday afternoon, June 17, 2011, Texas Governor Rick Perry signed into law SB 321 by Senator Glenn Hegar, Jr. (R-Katy) and Representative Tim Kleinschmidt (R-Lexington). SB 321 will protect the jobs of the vast majority of Texas employees wanting a firearm in their personal locked vehicle when parked on their employer’s parking lot.

This session’s success came after losses in three previous legislative sessions, due to the influence of the Texas Association of Business, the Chemical Council, USAA insurance in San Antonio, and every Chamber of Commerce in the state.

Senator Hegar passed the issue twice before in the Senate only to have his bill stall and ultimately be defeated in the House. Texas State Representative Kleinschmidt had what it took to push the issue across the finish line with the help of nearly 90 co-authors and Speaker Straus.

Thanks you, Governor Perry. We can all breathe a sigh of relief. SB 321 goes into effect on September 1st.

Also yesterday, Governor Perry signed TSRA’s Range Protection Bill. SB 766 was carried in the Senate by Senator Craig Estes (R-Wichita Falls) and in the House by Freshman State Representative Jason Isaac (R-Dripping Springs). Senator Estes stepped up to the plate at the beginning of session and asked to carry legislation to protect Texas shooting ranges. Representative Isaac followed in the footsteps of other State Representatives from his district by demonstrating his power and his dedication to the Second Amendment by successfully passing this important legislation.

Again, thank you, Governor Perry. All the guns in the world won’t matter if we have no place to shoot!

TSRA passed two out of the three issues listed on our Legislative Agenda for 2011. We again upheld our commitment to our members to work for the greatest good for the greatest number of Texas gun-owners. SB 321 and SB 766 move us in the right direction toward 2nd amendment rights and personal protection.

Both bills go into effect September 1st.


93 posted on 06/18/2011 10:07:17 PM PDT by davetex (All my weapons got melted by a meteor!! No Sh*t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: davetex

The best bit is that Perry put his personal signature on the bill.
He didn’t have to sign it to become law.
He chose to attach his name to it.

Good for him.


94 posted on 06/18/2011 11:07:10 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: davetex

I think Perry has 11,000 bills to sign or veto before monday.
He doesn’t have to sign for them to become law in this special legislation.

The fact that he took the time and the political stance to attach his name to these laws makes me admire him.

He could have ducked this and still had it become law.
He can veto to block, but he could say nothing and the law will pass.
By signing he is making a political statement that he endorses the law.

Good for Perry


95 posted on 06/18/2011 11:26:07 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Agreed, I think most things always evolve, and I think Perry has done just that. Heck, I was at the first Tea Party event in Austin in 09 and so was Perry and Williams.

I see some folks posting that he is an “open borders” guy, but I don’t see that. Maybe I’m wrong. What I do see is him putting state resources on the border including Rangers, Wardens, Troopers, and working with the Sheriff’s dept’s. Hell, it’s not the job of the states to protect the nations borders.

Is he perfect? Well, I guess not, but neither am I. I think the Guardisil argument is a red herring, along with the TTC. Neither one came to fruition.

Interesting times we live in. We’ll see how it shakes out.


96 posted on 06/18/2011 11:59:43 PM PDT by davetex (All my weapons got melted by a meteor!! No Sh*t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

What a great story.

Remember the NY Times (get a rope) film critic Pauline Kael who famously said:

“I live in a rather special world. I only know one person who voted for Nixon. Where they are I don’t know. They’re outside my ken. But sometimes when I’m in a theater I can feel them.”


97 posted on 06/19/2011 1:08:39 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: allsouthern

Perry is from Texas
Bush is from Texas (sort of)
Therefore, Perry is Bush

Wow. What a syllogism. It would make Aristotle proud!

Keep up the good work, genius.
You IS a philosopher!


98 posted on 06/19/2011 4:38:45 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
"Both parents were US Citizens at the time of his birth (Meets the Jus Sanguinis Requirement)"

Even Mitt can't say both his parents were born in the U.S.

99 posted on 06/19/2011 6:29:08 AM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
"“Our opponents on the left are never going to like us, so let’s stop trying to curry favor with them,” he said..."

Words like that make me think he might be the only one who truly "gets it."

Would it be so bad for the Country to be just a little more like Texas?

100 posted on 06/19/2011 6:31:40 AM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson