Posted on 06/09/2011 11:47:22 AM PDT by La Lydia
Why waste ammo on these lowlifes? Easier solution----landmine the borders.
“Execute the mofo ASAP. Ignore the Mexican Govt”
Better yet, BOMB the Mexican gov’t.
F@$* congress ....
Sounds like something out of The Enabling Acts except those were in German. Mein Kampf might also be referenced.
=========================================
Ohaha is colluding with foreign govts to undermine US national security. These govts consider the United States an invader state---a foreign power imposed on Third World hellholes. They arrogantly refuse to refer to the US by its legal name. The USis known by Mexicans as el Norte, (the North), el Otro Lado (the Other Side), or Gringolandia (the Anglo Entity).
The Third World is financing border invasions----to build a Marxist Third World on US soil.
=============================================
WAITING TO GET THEIR ORDERS FROM MEXICO
Reconquista shock troops at Phoenix Capital protest, May 29, 2010.
2009---TEXAS DREAM ACT DEMONSTRATION
Just here for a better life. Oops, forgot to tell us they
are are conspiring to destroy the USA from within.
Out with the old ...
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/03/19/ambassador-mexico-resigns-following-wikileaks-cable/
In with the new ...
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/06/09/obama_nominates_new_ambassador_to_mexico
Build a gas chamber with bench seating.
Cheaper that way.
Could have been a lot worse.
I knew Tony Garza. I haven’t a clue as to the new ones.
The new nominee Wayne seems to have the kind of experience required for ‘failed states’ duty.
You know, I have been thinking about this. He chose a career foreign-service guy who has been in some dicey places. I think that is a good sign, in that he didn’t send in one of his ideologue friends to screw things up worse. I almost want to think that BO realizes he doesn’t know anything about Mexico and had better leave it to the experts. That would be surprising. The Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemispheric Affairs, Arturo A. Valenzuela, who definitely had an agenda, who wasn’t even born in this country, and who might be characterized as anti-American, is leaving this summer. It could have been him, which would not have been good for our interests. Valenzuela sat on his hands when some very bad things were happening in Latin America. Menos mal.
How about all the Americans those Unwanted Smelly little Mexican chitazzes, execute here daily,with a gun knife or automobile.
Two reasons I am not so angry at this:
1. Treaties are "the supreme Law of the Land." U.S. Constitution, Article VI.
2. If you get arrested while on vacation in a foreign country, wouldn't you want that country to let you call the U.S. embassy?
The problem?
They aren't happening fast enough.
Good post La Lydia. It is a good sign.
1.Article VI has several amendments and appendages. It is factually false to state that “Treaties are the supreme Law of the Land”, no matter how you punctuate it.
2.Yes, having traveled in many foreign nations,if I had ever been arrested and/or falsely accused of violating one of their laws, I would certainly attempt to contact the U.S embassy.
The reason I, and most people in the USA are angry about cases like this, is that foreign nationals who are provided with taxpayer funded public defenders,will attempt to circumvent OUR laws to “free the defendant” instead of ensuring justice prevails.
Jose, Pierre, Abdullah and Igor (and their lawyers) can not be allowed to refuse contact with their country of origin embassy, in order to set up an appeal on a “technical violation” to have their convictions thrown out.
I have a simple solution for our Congressional legislative “angst”.
Craft a bill requiring Prosecutors to notify the embassy of the accused foreign national’s claimed country of origin upon indictment.
Problem solved.
I can see it now.
Treaty obligations and the 0bama administration say we must return this man.
Texas law says we return him at 500 mph.
And you approve of treaties because they are the law of the land? What if the Senate ratifies a treaty that takes away your right to own a gun?
In Medellin, the Supreme Court ruled that a treaty is not binding domestic law unless Congress has enacted statutes implementing it or the treaty itself conveys an intention that it is "self-executing". I will not even go into the International Court of Justice part of Medillin, because it makes my head explode. Suffice to say that the Supreme Court ruled against Mexico's claim that US membership in the UN requires us to comply with ICJ rulings. Mexico and Medellin can pound sand and the sooner he is executed, the better.
Finally, as I posted twice above, there is no pending congressional bill would require states to obey requirements of international treaties. That bill died with the last Congress and hasn't been reintroduced, for reason posted above.
Yeah... abolishing the death penalty worked so well in Mexico, didn’t it? Last I heard, murder is rampant there.
Perhaps, instead of spending so much time trying to save the life of a murderer in the US, the Mexican government could reinstate their death penalty and enforce it. Maybe it’s too late at this stage, with open warfare in the streets, but it’s worth a try, isn’t it?
There is a popular movement in Mexico to bring back the death penalty.
Do it like the Chinese, charge the family for the cartridge use to execute the POS.
For sure, Texas justice cuts down the rate of recidivism!
Regards,
GtG
Mexico's lack of capital punishment explains a lot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.