Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bachmann: 'Respect and admiration' for Palin
Politico ^ | Wednesday June 8, 2011 | Maggie Harbinger

Posted on 06/08/2011 12:10:22 PM PDT by Bigtigermike

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: Bigtigermike
SIDESTEP
41 posted on 06/08/2011 1:27:32 PM PDT by FrankR (A people that values its privileges above its principles will soon lose both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rob777
Ms. Bachmann-Romney supports Mitt BASED UPON HER FAILURE
to retract the Rollins comment.

It is OVER.

And, no, ONLY ON KOLOB did Gov.Palin "work for" backstabber Romney.



42 posted on 06/08/2011 1:30:31 PM PDT by Diogenesis ( Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

This election cycle will be something else. Don’t forget Herman Cain, should Palin run, will not bounce out. So, we’ll see what happens should it become a tight race between Cain and Palin and possibly Bachmann. Cain is not into mud-slinging.

The Great-one Mark Levin seems to like Santorum. So that helps Rick. Mark is bullish on Santorum, Bachmann, Palin and Cain.


43 posted on 06/08/2011 1:30:31 PM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hellbender
I don't know if I buy your conspiratorial assessment of Bachman.

That is your prerogative, of course. It's only an opinion. However, to clarify a bit; I don't simply believe that Michele Bachmann 'conspired' to run for the GOP presidential nomination as a 'roadblock' against a Palin candidacy. I believe that the GOP hierarchy engineered it. That is, they tacitly encouraged Bachmann to run and then to hire the Beltway insider, Ed Rollins to 'help' her. In short, I think Michel Bachmann was used. Willingly used, with ambition as her motivation. A promised V.P. slot on a Romney ticket would be sufficient motivation. I do agree that the 2012 election is greater than any one individual. I happen to favor Sarah Palin. I thought of Michele Bachmann as my fallback choice if Palin declined to run. Now, I'm looking at Herman Cain.

44 posted on 06/08/2011 1:32:44 PM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
I'm amused by all the trashing of Bachmann on here for her alleged sin of trashing another conservative. No hypocrisy there. Of course she didn't even do it, her strategist did it, and by the looks of this statement, her campaign is making efforts to dial it back. Near as I can tell, Bachmann herself has had only positive things to say about Palin.
45 posted on 06/08/2011 1:55:48 PM PDT by americanophile ("this absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, is a rotting corpse which poisons our lives" - Ataturk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott

“I do agree that the 2012 election is greater than any one individual. I happen to favor Sarah Palin. I thought of Michele Bachmann as my fallback choice if Palin declined to run. Now, I’m looking at Herman Cain.”

Agree on all 4 points.


46 posted on 06/08/2011 1:58:09 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott
Sorry that you think that any conservative would sell out like that. Look back at the Revolutionary War era. People like Adams and Jefferson fought together in the cause. Once the war was won, their partisans engaged in savage attacks on each other. Both men were great, both contributed vitally to the cause. Long after both had been President, they became friends.

We are now at a national crossroads. Survival is at stake. Re-election of America's first Marxist President dooms the Republic. Anyone who puts personal ambition against defeat of socialism does not deserve to lead.

Why don't all the good guys: Palin, Bachman, Cain, and Santorum, announce in advance they they will support to the hilt whichever among them seems most likely to win? That would convince the wavering sheeple and independents that we really stand for something other than greed and personal ambition.

47 posted on 06/08/2011 2:04:46 PM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
“The Congresswoman has nothing but admiration and respect for Governor Palin."

MB should be thinking "fear"

"In Alaska the landscape is littered with the bodies of those who crossed Sarah"

48 posted on 06/08/2011 3:07:42 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Monarchy is the one system of government where power is exercised for the good of all - Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hellbender

Another day has gone by, so Bachmann is not
a ‘good guy’.

Sadly, I thought she was a good candidate.
Not now. Not ever again.


49 posted on 06/08/2011 3:35:47 PM PDT by Diogenesis ( Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott

You may want to read this thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2731713/posts


50 posted on 06/08/2011 3:41:13 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
I'm not sure I would say "never again," but Michelle seems to have shown herself not ready for prime time. Maybe that simplifies things. I no longer have to struggle with the question of her vs. Palin.

I sometimes think that the parliamentary system is better than ours. By now we would have a "shadow govt. "of conservatives. Palin, Bachmann, Cain, Santorum, and others would all have a place in it.

51 posted on 06/08/2011 3:54:16 PM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Nothing alleged about it, she has her cancelled check from the man she hired to design and implement this strategy. He did not go rogue on his first day at work.


52 posted on 06/08/2011 6:03:09 PM PDT by ansel12 (Bachmann/Rollins/Romney=destruction for Bachmann, but it sure helps Romney. WHY?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson