Posted on 06/03/2011 4:02:46 AM PDT by stevie_d_64
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0295_0495_ZO.html
I believe that in Schechter, the Commerce Clause was DENIED the power to compel action from a business. So I don't see the reason you're invoking it here - Schechter could actually be used AGAINST the individual mandate. In fact, Schechter was one of the limits the Roosevelt Administration finally reached in it's efforts to centralize commerce under federal law.
Kool! I need that too!
That's why I posted it.
It should be.
The individual mandate violates the Tenth Amendment just as the Roosevelt Administration tried to do in Schechter.
The mandates are placed on small / medium sized businesses who operate solely intrastate.
You don't like how we're destroying the Constitution?
Simple solution. Just use less of it, you swine...!
Because the people that follow this person are too stupid to understand anything beyond the government checks coming in their mailbox each month...
Conservatives just cain’t get enough of our people to get pizzed off enough to make a “real” difference in our elected bodies...2010 was an interesting start, but not enough...And we still have too many moderates in the ranks to be effective anyway...More work is needed...
We ain’t done yet...
Well, I’m kicking him out of Uranus...
:-P
Wait...Hang on...Now “who’s” anus are we talking about here???
I’m confused, but then again, I’ve had a couple of cold beers this early afernoon, and I don’t want to lose the buzz at this particular juncture...;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.