If you want any support for your run at all you better the hell speak out on this ruling, and it better be soon.
The Indiana Supreme Court only has five justices?
Sounds like it’s tailor made for wingnut decisions to me.
I wonder if the Indiana state attorney general took a position on this case, any time before this ruling; in the form of a brief weighing in on the case or in the form of a public statement?
Okay Mitch, this is a deal breaker, right here and now.
If you want any support for your run at all you better the hell speak out on this ruling, and it better be soon.”””
EXACTLY
Mitch appointed him, but is Indiana a state where the Governor has a real choice in such appointments, or is it one, like my Iowa or Palin’s Alaska, where the Governor is forced to choice from a list supplied by someone else, a list that can be stacked as to provide no real choice. It’s possible this ruling is a deal breaker for his national aspirations, but it’s also possible he really had no choice. We need to learn that first before non-Hoosiers jump on it. Hoosiers of course need to investigate their “Iowa” options as well as get someone to appeal this to Federal Court. And pray for sanity there.
Judge Napolitano on the 4th Amendment Extremely educational
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8wEUhlXLG8