Posted on 05/11/2011 5:19:28 AM PDT by Kaslin
Ain’t that the truth.
ZOOT: "....and after the spanking, you shall zot the_concious and her naughty evil twin sister mommya for lighting the grail-shaped zot, which is explicitly banned here in Castle Anthrax".
YOUNG FREEPERS (all between the ages of 16 and 19 and 1/2):
A ZOTTING ! A ZOTTING! ZOT mommya next! ...and then the_consious!"
ZOOT: "Yes, Yes! Jim Robinson shall Zot all of the Paulbots!"
BTW...congrats for the double zot!
You must cut down the mightiest troll in the forum with....
A HERRING!
“A Path! A Path!”
You guys are messing up the scene!
“It’s just a flesh wound!”
I mean it, you’ll get the comfy chair!
Stop it I say! This thread is getting silly, as do most threads with Ron Paul and his Paulistinians!
Buh Bye
“Yes but, Albatross!”
It’s a seabird mate! A bleedin seabird!
“He’s just pining for the fjords!”
Wait, that’s not in that scene!
“Suddenly, everyone became Scottish!”
No, and there aren’t any giant Blancmange here either!
WoW, this wins dumbest post on the thread.
minimal(min)+ ruling/government(archy) = minarchy
no (an) + ruling government = anarchy
one (mono) + ruling = monarchy (rule by one)
Geez....
Rino Concorde: A Zot for you from Jim Robinson meLord!"
Sir Lancelot: To whoever finds this thread, I have been zotted by my father, Jim Robinson who wishes me to be a conservative against my will. Please, please, please come and rescue me.
I am in the tall tower of Paulbot Castle." -Signed mommya and the_concious
Sir Lancelot (to Concorde): At last! A call, a cry of a social liberal in distress! This could be the sign that leads us to the election of Ron Paul!
Brave, brave Concorde! You shall not have voted for John McCain and other RINOs and died in vain!
RINO Concorde:: I'm not quite dead yet my Lord!
You don’t have a problem with support of homosexual marriage and defunding our military?
How are either of those conservative and why should JR be forced to keep them on his site?
They weren’t zotted by consensus or majority vote. Or are you implying that JR is a puppet used by *the mob* to enact their will?
Like hundreds of thousands of other foreigners from Islamic countries, your government rolled out the red carpet for them, allowed them to enter, and then taught them to fly commercial jet aircraft.
To me this was a correct Constitutional interpretation of the 10th amendment. Am I wrong?
Incidentally,I am unalterably opposed to gay/homosexual marriage.
I’m not sure what your questions have to do with your appalling illiteracy. Perhaps you could try to explain it to me?
MOMMAYA: What I object to is you automatically treat me like an inferior!
JIMROB: Well, I AM king...
MOMMAYA: Oh king, eh, very nice. An' how'd you get that, eh? By exploitin' the Paulbots -- by 'angin' on to outdated conservative dogma which perpetuates the economic an' liberal social differences in our min-anarcho society! If there's ever going to be any progress--
THE_CONCIOUS: Mommya,there's some lovely Paulistian filth down here. Oh -- how d'you do?
JIMROB: How do you do, good lady. I am JIMROB, King of the FReepers. Who's thread is this?
THE_CONCIOUS: King of the who?
JIMROB: The FReepers.
THE_CONCIOUS: Who are the Freepers?
JIMROB: Well, we all are. we're all FReepers and I am your king.
THE_CONCIOUS: I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an anarcho-capitalist Paulistinian collective!
MOMMAYA: You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship. A self-perpetuating 9/11 conspiracy in which the truther classes--
THE_CONCIOUS: Oh there you go, bringing "9/11 was an inside job" into it again.
[singing] ah low, ha, oh way, ah low, ha, oh way...
Thanks TOL, and thanks JimRob.
I’m socially liberal in that I think society needs a liberal slapping around once in a while.
Oh my!! LOLOL!!!!
What a magnificent ZOT you have there Lady! :D
Too bad your friends were zotted but that’s the way it goes. This isn’t a libertarian forum. It’s Conservative.
Now, as for this thread, can someone show me the quote where ‘the_concience’ supported abortion or homosexual marriage? I read through all the posts on this thread and didn't see it. He (she) stated clearly that they didn't think it fell in the constitutional limits of the federal government.
'I think some issues should be settled at the state level' is not the same as ‘I support buggery and think everyone should do it as often as possible.’
I have no interest in getting into a long drawn out argument with the Moral Absolutes pinglist, especially since I believe in moral absolutes. I see you all are already questioning my loyalty, conservativism and probably manhood. I'm sure someone has already checked the last eight years of my posts for proper compliance.
My question is only about why they got banned.
Sounds like a triple zot with cheese coming up judging by the amount of whine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.