This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 01/01/2012 5:58:18 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator, reason:
New TM 2012 #1 thread: |
Posted on 05/04/2011 12:06:24 PM PDT by MestaMachine
From LLF:
Our motion is as simple as a motion can be. It asserts one uncontested fact and one legal definition, which is quoted directly from the Supreme Court. Our only argument for this motion is this: Obamas father was never a U.S. citizen and the Supreme Court has defined natural-born citizen to be a person with two U.S. citizen-parents. This leaves the Democratic party only two options: Argue that Obamas father was a U.S. citizen, or argue that the Supreme Court definition of natural-born citizen isnt what it clearly is. They will NOT argue the former. They will argue the latter. This means that we will be exactly where we want to be: arguing what the definition of natural-born citizen is under the U.S. Constitution. This is the argument we want to have.
Some may ask why we arent addressing the birth certificate or the social security number or the various other inconsistencies in Obamas history and documentation. The reason is that confusion is the primary tool of legal defendants. If the defense can bring up a myriad of facts and legal jargon to confuse the issue, they win. If we raise every issue that is out there, the defendants will focus on our weakest argument and move the debate to their advantage. We want to control the argument and focus the Court to the major and most clear issue the fact that Obama is not a natural born citizen by his own admission.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2826548/posts
Taliban prisoner at Gitmo key to peace talks? (Obama preparing American’s unconditional surrender)
msnbc ^ | 12/29/2011 | Mark Hosenball, Missy Ryan and Warren Strobel/ Reuters
Posted on Thursday, December 29, 2011 7:54:52 PM by tobyhill
The Obama administration is considering transferring to Afghan custody a senior Taliban official suspected of major human rights abuses as part of a long-shot bid to improve the prospects of a peace deal in Afghanistan, Reuters has learned.
The potential hand-over of Mohammed Fazl, a “high-risk detainee” held at the Guantanamo Bay military prison since early 2002, has set off alarms on Capitol Hill and among some U.S. intelligence officials.
As a senior commander of the Taliban army, Fazl is alleged to be responsible for the killing of thousands of Afghanistan’s minority Shiite Muslims between 1998 and 2001.
According to U.S. military documents made public by WikiLeaks, he was also on the scene of a November 2001 prison riot that killed CIA operative Johnny Michael Spann, the first American who died in combat in the Afghan war. There is no evidence, however, that Fazl played any direct role in Spann’s death.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.