Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cloud computing and Internet use suck energy, emit CO2, says Greenpeace
LA Times ^ | 22 Apr 2011 | Tiffany Hsu

Posted on 04/24/2011 11:16:39 PM PDT by smokingfrog

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Kill your facebook account They're destroying the planet!
1 posted on 04/24/2011 11:16:46 PM PDT by smokingfrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Amazing! I better send this link to everyone in my address book,,, (snicker)


2 posted on 04/24/2011 11:20:19 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Hey Greenpeace, do you know if whale oil burns cleaner than natural gas?/s;)


3 posted on 04/24/2011 11:21:05 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Really? This so just makes me want to phart.


4 posted on 04/24/2011 11:22:19 PM PDT by Not now, Not ever! (Girlfriend suggested I use pelosi in place of swear words, A good idea, I think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


5 posted on 04/24/2011 11:27:48 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
Hey Greenpeace!!!!


6 posted on 04/24/2011 11:39:08 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (The last Democrat worth a damn was Stalin. He purged his whole Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

members of greenpeace should quit exhaling CO2 and save the planet...


7 posted on 04/24/2011 11:43:11 PM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

If we turned off all these electronic devices, we would kill the economy which would kill a lot of people.

I am sure Greenpeace would be happy if we went back to mechanical typewriters and the tons of paper to crank through them.


8 posted on 04/24/2011 11:50:49 PM PDT by jonrick46 (2012 can't come soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog; Bockscar; grey_whiskers; WL-law; IrishCatholic; Whenifhow; SolitaryMan; mmanager; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

9 posted on 04/24/2011 11:51:57 PM PDT by steelyourfaith (If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Please shut up. I am tired of arguing with you green hand-wringing ninnies. If you don’t like CO2 then support nuclear. If you want renewable then support more hydro electric dams. Say you hate progress, say you want to abolish modern civilization. But quit using “science” in your flawed, circular and deceptive arguments. Just shut up and go away.


10 posted on 04/25/2011 12:01:00 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (If every person were like Sarah Palin, this world would be a peaceful, beautiful world to live in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Pixel Power Producers Possibly Punish Planet with Pollution.

I see! But to be fair many sites recycle garbage so it may all balance out.


11 posted on 04/25/2011 12:07:05 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Fermentation is the process by which yeast converts glucose sugars to ethyl alcohol and carbon dioxide gas.

A similar study should be conducted to determine total CO2 output from Ethenol generally, and Beer in particular. A third of the annual US corn crop is diverted to these uses, so the numbers must be staggering.


12 posted on 04/25/2011 12:29:30 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Well if anyone would know about sucking, it’s Greenpeace.


13 posted on 04/25/2011 12:30:38 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Let’s see: efficiency of power usage, clean sourcing... what’s missing? How about efficiency of processing: Less waste in operating system overhead equals fewer cycles needed to perform a given task. The high-to-low and low-to-high swings are where current draw comes in, and is why faster processors require more heat. Running a modern CPU with no heat sync/fan will burn it up in a matter of seconds - if not faster.

Code more efficiently. Jettison DLLs in favor of organic programming, where systems are initialized ONCE - not once for each thing that uses them. Bigger but more efficient code.

Eventually you can get it down to the point that you do not NEED six billion clock transitions (=3GHz) to power these servers. You can run just as fast at 500Mhz, perform exactly the same tasks in the same amount of time with greater efficiency.

Alternatively, keep the newer modern equipment but with the refactored architecture, but just perform the tasks more quickly and then sleep in a no-cycle state until the next requests.

People are overlooking how the trends in software toward complex modular (not organic) systems, most of which now require gargantuan non-organic frameworks like Microsof’s .NET, have likewise contributed to energy inefficiency. Going against “conventional wisdom” in computer science, on a grand scale, could help reduce power requirements, reduce power bills, and reduce carbon footprints.

A win-win.


14 posted on 04/25/2011 1:30:38 AM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Greenpeace sucks IQ from the planet. They just plain suck too.


15 posted on 04/25/2011 2:07:14 AM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

“In 2005, the U.S. had 10.3 million data centers gobbling up enough energy to power all of Britain for two months, according to Internet marketing company WordStream.”

One datacenter for every 30 people in US? http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/8/11/hahahahahah128629548180562774.jpg


16 posted on 04/25/2011 3:06:50 AM PDT by mewykwistmas (“An honest politician is one who, when he is bought, will stay bought.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frank_2001

Please don’t blame the whales for the f*ing retards in Greenpeace. I want to feed those jerk offs to the polar bears.


17 posted on 04/25/2011 3:50:57 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Who but the press gives a rats ass what the ayatollahs at Greenpeace think about anything? They’re loopy activists, that’s all they are.


18 posted on 04/25/2011 3:51:12 AM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Of course, on the other hand, if they have connections to the all-powerful EPA, they may hang us all.


19 posted on 04/25/2011 3:52:27 AM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

I think Greenpeace probably emits more harmful gas into the atmosphere every time one of them opens their sanctimonious mouths.


20 posted on 04/25/2011 3:53:45 AM PDT by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson