Posted on 03/26/2011 6:23:56 PM PDT by thatjoeguy
The list, ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
When political commentators from the Fox News Channel had books whose sales would normally make the New York Times’ non-fiction best-seller list, the New York Times changed the rules for putting books on that list. Thus best-selling political books by Mike Huckabee and Dick Morris appeared last Sunday on a more obscure list of miscellaneous personal advice and how-to books, such as “Weight Watchers New Complete Cookbook.
Whoa! I thought the NYT Best seller list was their last remaining scrap of integrity. There went that scrap.
Obamas Deficit Avalanche isnt Bushs Fault scottuystarnes.com / 2/9/2010
Washington Times reports: Even more staggering than the mountains of snow in the capital are the deficits the Obama administration plans for the next decade. Huge spending increases will add about $12 trillion to the national debt for budget years 2009 to 2020. The scariest part is that these deficits are based on unrealistic budgeting assumptions; the real fiscal outlook is much bleaker. In the proposed 2011 budget, the White House defensively attacks the irresponsibility of past deficits.
For example, the 2009 budget deficit of $1.4 trillion is blamed on the George W. Bush administration as if President Obamas $862 billion stimulus package and more than $400 billion supplemental spending bill had nothing to do with it. Mr. Obamas planned 2010 budget deficit rises to an even higher record level of $1.6 trillion.
By comparison, all of Mr. Bushs deficits from 2002 to 2008 the seven years during which his team had the most control over the budget produced a combined deficit of $2.1 trillion. Obama has spent more in 2 years than Bush did in 7 years. Obamas BIOB (Blame it on Bush) defense just wont work anymore.
That's the only thing I disagree with as my Village owns two 'Public' Golf Courses, though 'municipal' is not in their name like many courses are. And we don't subsidize them, they MAKE Money and help keep our Village taxes low (No increase in over a decade).
One course is your 'typical' daily fee type Golf Course, well kept fairways and greens but not exactly 'Pro quality'. The other course IS 'Pro Quality' and the fee for a round & cart rental reflect it.
Our Village is well run as to its finances and if either course started to cost money they'd prolly be turned in Public Parks in a heart beat. Not sold off to Developers for housing on every square foot. (We believe in 'Open Spaces' and have been named 'Tree City' for so many years in a row I can't remember.)
So if a course is run properly and makes money I have no problem with a 'Municipal Golf Course'.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.