Skip to comments.
Sarah Palin: America’s Sweetheart No More?
Pajamas Media ^
| March 21, 2011
| Carey Roberts
Posted on 03/22/2011 5:08:01 AM PDT by FreeManDC
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-175 next last
To: Reagan69
So LET HER RUN - we will see who is right. I completely agree with that statement. Though I think the public has been too propagandized to see her in a different light than it already does, her presence in the campaign will certainly make it interesting.
I do hope she's well-versed enough in policy matters to make a strong stand in the debates. If she is, her stock will rise.
We shall see.
81
posted on
03/22/2011 6:25:48 AM PDT
by
ScottinVA
(Libya is NOT our fight. Think LONG TERM!!)
To: FreeManDC
How do we explain this stunning reversal for the immensely ambitious political wunderkind? Non-stop negative media coverage, or is this a rhetorical question?
To: alarm rider
That’s right, if anyone questions Palin we’re all labeled as having PDS, get real, you sound like a freaking Obama supporter.
You know what, everyone one of you that refuses to see any negatives with Palin is no better than an Obama supporter circa 2008.
Stop putting all your hops and faith into some candidate, they’re human, they fail, they’re not perfect.
My God, you’re becoming a cult.
83
posted on
03/22/2011 6:27:57 AM PDT
by
gjones77
To: svcw
Hey, I admit that it could just be me.
Maybe it’s just that her voice reminds me so much of my ex-wife screeching at me.
84
posted on
03/22/2011 6:29:16 AM PDT
by
Scanian
(i)
To: FreeManDC
They created a cartoon character on Saturday Night Live whom they dubbed “Sarah Palin” and then polled on her. Most people who aren’t paying attention out there aren’t even hearing from the real Sarah Palin right now. Once she gets out there on the campaign trail without McCain handlers she’ll do okay.
To: FreeManDC
You know how your leg jumps when the doctor hits your knee with that little rubber hammer?...well that same thing happens when Pajamas media ( and some others) hear anything good about Sarah Palin.
And we hear good things about Palin everyday, which is why there is a Palin hit piece in the news everyday...knee-jerks.
Sarah knocked the ball out of the park with Bibi yesterday and is looking a million times more presidential than the current "free nation sabatuer" we now have in office.
Trump is hitting his own palm with a wad of his "own money", obviously intent on buying the presidency like obama and acrorn did; Romney is doing the teaberry shuffle between "romneycare" and RINOism; the others in the field seem to be marking time, waiting on Sarah to announce before they unload, or dropout.
Netanyahu did not clear his calender to meet with, and have dinner with the Palins just out of courtesy, he knows full-well that she has a big chance of winning and he's getting some advance points in.
PJ media and others are going to slam her everyday, that's what they do, they have their orders, ya know.
The good news is, the only place PJ Media gets any coverage is here on FR, and somebody always has to post it...otherwise, whoever heard of them?
86
posted on
03/22/2011 6:35:01 AM PDT
by
FrankR
(The Evil Are Powerless If The Good Are Unafraid! - R. Reagan)
To: gjones77
When you stop calling women you don’t agree with whores I’ll stop calling you a sexist pig.
87
posted on
03/22/2011 6:35:02 AM PDT
by
unseen1
To: Daisyjane69
One of the main reasons I support Gov Palin is because of that ideology. I understand that to take the Reaganite off the stage means to take Reaganism off the stage.
88
posted on
03/22/2011 6:38:01 AM PDT
by
unseen1
To: Scanian
I said no such thing that you are Pissant the II ......but you said that she is unelectable and I ask you on what basis and you haven’t yet revealed why? Everyone has an opinion one way or the other, but not all opinions are equal
To: gjones77
We know you don’t like Palin. Who’s your candidate?
Then maybe we can debate them on the issues, background, etc. Instead of name calling.
The bottomline is the so-called “Palinistas” have chosen a candidate to back, while you guys do drive-bys with negative MSM stories, then fail to state who you are backing.
90
posted on
03/22/2011 6:39:06 AM PDT
by
nhwingut
(Palin '12... Accept No Other)
To: unseen1
Ahh... Attention Whore is a designation that is independent of sex, hell, John Kerry is an Attention Whore. So your argument holds no weight. And for the record, get a freaking dictionary, they're free online... whore (hôr, hr) n. 1. A prostitute. 2. A person considered sexually promiscuous. 3. A person considered as having compromised principles for personal gain. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/whore
91
posted on
03/22/2011 6:40:05 AM PDT
by
gjones77
To: nhwingut
Honestly, I haven’t seen a great candidate yet, I know of people I would like, but they may or may not be running.
92
posted on
03/22/2011 6:41:53 AM PDT
by
gjones77
To: gjones77
ROFL....the moderator thought your post was sexist garbage too. It has been removed. It’s a good day when Free republic starts calling the sexist idiots around here to account. First pissant got banned for his sexist crap now your comment got deleted....makes me proud to be a Freeper You don’t like Palin? Fine. Explain why without going into the gutter.
93
posted on
03/22/2011 6:49:50 AM PDT
by
unseen1
To: backwoods-engineer
They fear her like the devils quail at the cross. Pardon my ignorance. What does this refer to?
94
posted on
03/22/2011 6:52:45 AM PDT
by
houeto
(Government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed.)
To: unseen1
Doesn’t matter what you or the moderator think, doesn’t change the meaning of the word in the English language.
Don’t blame me for your poor language comprehension skills...
95
posted on
03/22/2011 6:53:52 AM PDT
by
gjones77
To: FreeManDC
The writer has never heard of paragraphs, and I didn’t bother to read it. Besides, I already knew what was in it.
Whatever the phony numbers, millions of Americans admire and trust Sarah Palin, and I am one of them.
96
posted on
03/22/2011 6:55:42 AM PDT
by
Malesherbes
(Sauve qui peut)
To: Bigtigermike
OK...aside from Texas and possibly Florida, what big states could she win?
97
posted on
03/22/2011 6:58:49 AM PDT
by
Scanian
(i)
To: gjones77
Rand Paul will get the same 3% he always gets.
Irrelevant...and a nutty buddy.
98
posted on
03/22/2011 6:59:29 AM PDT
by
rbmillerjr
(The political 2012 is here....Let's get it done !)
To: gjones77
and don’t blame me for people thinking your a sexist pig because of your word choices.
99
posted on
03/22/2011 7:01:37 AM PDT
by
unseen1
To: gjones77
You know what happens when you assume right? OK, so here we go:
1. Never an Obama supporter.
2. I never put my “hops” (hope) and/or faith into any human.
3. Not cult orientated.
As such, I support Mrs. Palin because she seems the closest to my personal beliefs when it comes to religion, the body politic and just basic pro-American thought.
Also, I have been here at FR long enough to observe that any candidate is questioned to the max and for a long time. I also note that there are certain people who cannot resist jumping into every thread with a negative. If you disagree with the concept, then move on, that way we can all keep it adult-like and polite without having to use terms like “jackass”. It shows that you are indeed more interested one way or another than you let on. Have a nice day!
100
posted on
03/22/2011 7:01:56 AM PDT
by
alarm rider
(The left will always tell you who they fear the most. What are they telling you now?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-175 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson