Skip to comments.
Canadian fighter jets heading to Libya
Toronto Sun ^
| March 17, 2011
| DAVID AKIN
Posted on 03/17/2011 8:53:52 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 last
To: null and void
To: rahbert
lol...The Kanucks stole and old idea from Warthog crews. A painted cockpit on the bottom makes it harder for gunners to determine which way the aircraft is turning.
To: Always Independent
Hooks on F-15’s are an emergency slow down device. They will not take repeated carrier landing, not to mention it would drive the gear up through the wings.
To: rahbert
it does look wrong at first glance
To: spyone
I cant believe it. France and Italy are less than half an hour from Libya. GB is one hour. The cowardly Europeans have punted to the dilapidated Canadian airforce half a world away. Cowards!What leads you to suppose that the countries you mention (and several other European countries) are not contributing their forces also, and in much larger numbers? The Canadians are involved only because, it seems, they wanted to join in.
To: Husker24
In all of Western Europe, there are not enough aircraft to deal with Libyas two bit airforce? NATO has to rely on Canada to fly them all the way to Europe?What makes you think that? Half a dozen European countries are leading on this with their own forces. The Canadians are involved only because, apparently, they want to be.
To: saltus
Do you prefer having American men and women paying a price as policemen of the world?First of all, thanks for your explanation.
Second, I am against having the US get involved in the Libya conflict because I do not want our men and women to be policemen of the world, especially in this case. (We had the moral authority to take out Q several decades ago, and we let it go.)
67
posted on
03/18/2011 7:10:48 AM PDT
by
mlocher
(Is it time to cash in before I am taxed out?)
Comment #68 Removed by Moderator
To: buccaneer81
No, Quebec can go to hell. They are not Canada.They're Quebec, just how much closer can they get?
nully, who is vacationing in Canada this summer, getting it out of his system early...
69
posted on
03/18/2011 8:52:40 AM PDT
by
null and void
(We are now in day 786 of our national holiday from reality. - It's never 3 AM at the White Hut)
To: mlocher
(We had the moral authority to take out Q several decades ago, and we let it go.) Hey, it wasn't for a lack of trying. Google Operation El Dorado Canyon for a history lesson.
70
posted on
03/18/2011 8:54:36 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: tanknetter
71
posted on
03/18/2011 8:59:57 AM PDT
by
null and void
(We are now in day 786 of our national holiday from reality. - It's never 3 AM at the White Hut)
To: mad_as_he$$
The F-15 can’t land on a carrier at all. My thread mentioned that I’ve seen an F-15 make an arrested landing at Clark AFB in the PI. And Canadian F-18s are carrier capable as are all F-18s.
To: tanknetter
It was the Canadians that first developed the concept. They came up with the idea sometime after they started developing F-18 operations.
To: F15Eagle
Thats because the USAF bought into the F-4 program after originally being develloped for the USN.
Comment #75 Removed by Moderator
To: Yo-Yo
I am aware we tried. Thanks.
76
posted on
03/18/2011 10:37:21 AM PDT
by
mlocher
(Is it time to cash in before I am taxed out?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson