Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canadian fighter jets heading to Libya
Toronto Sun ^ | March 17, 2011 | DAVID AKIN

Posted on 03/17/2011 8:53:52 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: null and void
Nope. The Canucks paint cockpits on the bottoms of their fighters.

Not just the Canadians - a lot of other countries put false canopies on their combat aircraft as well. Including the US. Now if only the US would start putting the old Ferris disruptive scheme back on its planes - those were REALLY cool!






61 posted on 03/18/2011 4:52:45 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rahbert
lol...The Kanucks stole and old idea from Warthog crews. A painted cockpit on the bottom makes it harder for gunners to determine which way the aircraft is turning.
62 posted on 03/18/2011 4:57:47 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Always Independent
Hooks on F-15’s are an emergency slow down device. They will not take repeated carrier landing, not to mention it would drive the gear up through the wings.
63 posted on 03/18/2011 5:04:00 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

it does look wrong at first glance


64 posted on 03/18/2011 5:39:17 AM PDT by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: spyone
I can’t believe it. France and Italy are less than half an hour from Libya. GB is one hour. The cowardly Europeans have punted to the dilapidated Canadian airforce half a world away. Cowards!

What leads you to suppose that the countries you mention (and several other European countries) are not contributing their forces also, and in much larger numbers? The Canadians are involved only because, it seems, they wanted to join in.

65 posted on 03/18/2011 5:57:27 AM PDT by Winniesboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
In all of Western Europe, there are not enough aircraft to deal with Libya’s two bit airforce? NATO has to rely on Canada to fly them all the way to Europe?

What makes you think that? Half a dozen European countries are leading on this with their own forces. The Canadians are involved only because, apparently, they want to be.

66 posted on 03/18/2011 6:01:07 AM PDT by Winniesboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: saltus
Do you prefer having American men and women paying a price as “policemen of the world”?

First of all, thanks for your explanation.

Second, I am against having the US get involved in the Libya conflict because I do not want our men and women to be policemen of the world, especially in this case. (We had the moral authority to take out Q several decades ago, and we let it go.)

67 posted on 03/18/2011 7:10:48 AM PDT by mlocher (Is it time to cash in before I am taxed out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

To: buccaneer81
No, Quebec can go to hell. They are not Canada.

They're Quebec, just how much closer can they get?

nully, who is vacationing in Canada this summer, getting it out of his system early...

69 posted on 03/18/2011 8:52:40 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 786 of our national holiday from reality. - It's never 3 AM at the White Hut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mlocher
(We had the moral authority to take out Q several decades ago, and we let it go.)

Hey, it wasn't for a lack of trying. Google Operation El Dorado Canyon for a history lesson.

70 posted on 03/18/2011 8:54:36 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

Way cool! Thanks!


71 posted on 03/18/2011 8:59:57 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 786 of our national holiday from reality. - It's never 3 AM at the White Hut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

The F-15 can’t land on a carrier at all. My thread mentioned that I’ve seen an F-15 make an arrested landing at Clark AFB in the PI. And Canadian F-18s are carrier capable as are all F-18s.


72 posted on 03/18/2011 9:25:57 AM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

It was the Canadians that first developed the concept. They came up with the idea sometime after they started developing F-18 operations.


73 posted on 03/18/2011 9:28:55 AM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Thats because the USAF bought into the F-4 program after originally being develloped for the USN.


74 posted on 03/18/2011 9:32:47 AM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: Yo-Yo

I am aware we tried. Thanks.


76 posted on 03/18/2011 10:37:21 AM PDT by mlocher (Is it time to cash in before I am taxed out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson