Skip to comments.
No repeat of Chernobyl disaster for Japan
Alert Net ^
| 12 March 2011
| Elizabeth Piper
Posted on 03/12/2011 5:54:08 PM PST by Nobel_1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Comment #1 Removed by Moderator
To: All
2
posted on
03/12/2011 5:54:53 PM PST
by
Nobel_1
(bring on the Patriots!)
To: Nobel_1
Japan should not expect a repeat of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster CNN is deeply saddened...
3
posted on
03/12/2011 5:57:05 PM PST
by
SteamShovel
("Does the noise in my head bother you?")
To: SteamShovel
4
posted on
03/12/2011 5:58:40 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
To: Nobel_1
Aren’t there multiple reactors in danger? If several blow that’s not a Category 7 disaster (highest possible for nuclear events).
I think the Japanese gov’t is trying to save face and prevent widespread panic.
If pumping in sea water — the salt has a corrosive effect and they are writing off ever using it again — this is far worse than we’re being told.
To: SteamShovel
6
posted on
03/12/2011 6:03:38 PM PST
by
ColdOne
(AZamericonnie took my tagline & won't give it back!":))
To: Nobel_1
I could be wrong, but if this article proves to be true and the clean-up isn’t horrendously expensive, this “accident” could be the single best argument FOR nuclear power.
7
posted on
03/12/2011 6:03:41 PM PST
by
REDWOOD99
To: SteamShovel
CNN is deeply saddened... CNN is like the dog chasing a car ... once the dog catches up to the car he don't know what to do with it!!!
To: Nobel_1
Of course Fox News just announced a little while ago that now the Japs are saying there is an emergency with the other reactor on that site. Bu they are not elaborating at the moment.
9
posted on
03/12/2011 6:04:48 PM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: SteamShovel
I actually heard a cnn reporter ask ‘Is there widespread LOOTING going on????’ The man in Japan said ‘Uuuh, no.’
To: TigerClaws
The word earlier was this plant was scheduled to go offline this year.
11
posted on
03/12/2011 6:06:40 PM PST
by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
To: Mr_Moonlight
msnbc.com may have to downsize today’s giant font for this story.
12
posted on
03/12/2011 6:06:55 PM PST
by
John W
(Natural-born US citizen since 1955)
To: TigerClaws
I think the Japanese govt is trying to save face and prevent widespread panic.I think posters on the internet are letting their vivid imaginations run wild. The reality is that the Japanese have many "tools' available to them to respond to this situation. They know what to do and will react in a far better manner than many internet posters are.
13
posted on
03/12/2011 6:07:00 PM PST
by
NRG1973
To: barbarianbabs
It’s not what Lincoln wanted to eradicate.
14
posted on
03/12/2011 6:08:01 PM PST
by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
To: eyedigress
lol
there will be 0 looting in Japan
To: NRG1973
I believe the most that is required will handle this. It involves mass destruction and possible effects. This is a terrible event yet the world will do the best they can, That’s all.
16
posted on
03/12/2011 6:11:56 PM PST
by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
To: TigerClaws
...If pumping in sea water the salt has a corrosive effect and they are writing off ever using it again this is far worse than were being told...These reactors are 40 years old and were actually scheduled to be taken offline permanently later this month.
To: REDWOOD99
I could be wrong, but if this article proves to be true and the clean-up isnt horrendously expensive, this accident could be the single best argument FOR nuclear power.That's exactly what I was thinking!
18
posted on
03/12/2011 6:13:42 PM PST
by
cantfindagoodscreenname
(I really hate not knowing what was said in the deleted posts....)
To: Nobel_1
Here are the two big problems that made the Chernobyl problem worse:
1) When the graphite moderators on that reactor overheated, it started to burn and became HIGHLY explosive.
2) There was no containment structure to stop the spread of the radioactive fallout from the reactor explosion.
That's why when Chernobyl exploded it easily spread as much fallout as that from a medium-yield nuclear bomb explosion.
19
posted on
03/12/2011 6:18:19 PM PST
by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's economic cure)
To: FReepaholic
A Nuc neighbor took me through a 40’s reactor when I was 14. It was not operational. The Cooling was still in place. This was Oak Ridge, TN. He advised us to not jump into the pool.
20
posted on
03/12/2011 6:21:11 PM PST
by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson