Analysis: Palin's celeb feuds don't lead to the W.H.

Politico ^ | 3/7/1 | Andy Barr

[pissant]

“You assert she was for LOST”

Good effin grief. Read her damn letter. PALIN IS EMPAHTICALLY stating she supports the ratification of LOST. In the very first paragraph. She is begging her senators to vote for it. I don’t give a sh*t what kind of idiotic justification she or anyone else uses to support that turd.

Read the damn thing, right here:

http://globalsolutions.org/files/general/Palin_LOS_Letter.pdf

“You assert she is somehow “pro-choice” in her opposition to Roe v. Wade. Utterly contemptible...”

Bullsh*t. I assert no such thing. What I QUOTED, not asserted, is that she believes in “states rights” when it comes to the life of the unborn.

http://www.ontheissues.org/sarah_palin.htm

IOTW, the feds can not or should not mandate that life at conception is constitutionally protected or prohibit the states from abolishing abortion. States rights for abortion, yet nanny state totalitarianism when it comes to such important things as the feminist claptrap Title IX.

No. The only ones spinning are her cultists. I give direct quotes.

[Dead Corpse]

She emphatically states she doesn't want us to lose soveriengty over our coastal resources. A far cry from what you are whining about.

As for abortion:

Q: What are your views on abortion?
A: I am pro-life. With the exception of a doctor’s determination that the mother’s life would end if the pregnancy continued. I believe that no matter what mistakes we make as a society, we cannot condone ending another life.
Source: Eagle Forum 2006 Gubernatorial Candidate Questionnaire Jul 31, 2006

You quote selectively and with an agenda. What will you do when the Left-media start doing the same thing to Bachmann? She has plenty in her closet to do the same thing to her.

You finger in the wind types are all the same. Ignore the principles, run with the talking points.