Posted on 02/21/2011 10:29:38 AM PST by Gena Bukin
Either way, Muskegon County Sheriff Dean Roesler said the video is disturbing and a “family member” of one of the students immediately alerted school officials to the video.
School officials then alerted police, Roesler said.
These are the lyrics that he dubbed to the video of 1st grade children.
This is PORN. And he USED 6 year olds.
Defending some sleaze who thinks it’s funny to use children as a prop in a video laced with disgusting lyrics is Conservative to you?
Get a grip. Anyone doing that to my children better be armed.
In case you hadn’t noticed, child pornography advocates are in the minority here. There were only a couple of you on this thread, and the other one has been zotted. So just maybe I was right about the direction Jim Robinson is going with this site.
Where was there sexual abuse of children?
No evidence of any of that.
A guy said some sick stuff and edited in approving faces of children. Am I right?
And you think this is sexual abuse of children?
You must not be concerned about REAL sexual abuse of children, if you want to equate the 2.
And others are so concerned about the trauma to the kids that you’re talking about this nationally. The parents never shoulda gone to the cops. Now the kids are in the newspaper. It wasn’t a story until the cops were involved.
Unless I missed the partt where the parents asked the guy to take the clip off youtube and the part where they threatened to sue him if he didn’t take the clip off youtube. (And I may have, definitely not saying I didn’t)
“Wrong” and “Illegal” are different.
Those laws would be on the state level, not the federal level.
So now you’re saying it was the parents’ fault for finding out about it? You honestly believe it’s okay to feature children in pornography, as long the parents don’t find out? And if the parents do find out, they should sell their children into the sex trade? What the hell is wrong with you?
Conservatives seek to PROTECT children, NOT exploit them.
No it isn’t. If anything its the ultra .... of the right.
And states rights, and wanting to limit the power of fedgov is not the same as libertarianism.
You might consider explaining why I’m wrong, and not with the insults.
When asked by a TV reporter if he regretted making and posting the video, in which he appears to sing a vulgar song to first-graders, Emory answered it would depend on “how many views it gets on the Internet.
he was charged last week with manufacturing child sexually abusive material, a 20-year felony, in a case that has attracted international attention.
The end product was a pornographic video featuring children who were recognizable. It’s disturbing that anyone would defend that.
And now we know that the kids weren’t there. And I would disagree with “once it’s out, it’s out”. Why would someone save this? It sounds like we’re talking about a dirtier, more offensive, less funny version of a Whitest Kids sketch. The article wasn’t clear about how popular this was.
Yes. It is. AND to believe THEY are taking the high road.
Don’t we make fun of liberals by saying “but it’s for the children”?
You believe that exploiting children is conservative? You think it’s ok?
Again you lie. The children were there. He went into the classroom and video taped them. He did not draw cartoon pictures of children. He used real children. He put their actual images on You Tube. The children he abused are not cartoon characters. They are real.
Only a liberal would think that means conservatives like to harm children.
It’s done in movies all the time. A character says something risque or commits a violent act and it’s edited to make it look like children were there when it happened.
LIBERALS exploit and use children. CONSERVATIVES protect them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.