Posted on 02/21/2011 10:29:38 AM PST by Gena Bukin
Why are the parents names known?
Where is the video?
If the video will be “around forever”, it should be around now, right? Link please. You have no link, because youtube took it down. it’s gone.
I have no personal interest in it other than the fact that the filth and lies are destroying people, that’s why I’m interested. But for you to give a running commentary on the sewage that’s out there as though people on this thread were interested, when it’s obvious that’s the cesspit your live in, is strange.
So you’d have no problem with States passing laws against pornography?
Just because other people aren’t bringing up States Rights doesn’t mean it’s not important to them. I merely brought it up because you trotted out the Libertarian lying crap about we want huge fedgov.
Libertarianism is merely the ultra fringe kook anarchy wing of the Left.
It's pretty shallow thinking to use the *Well, nobody was hurt* line. There are more than one way of hurting people. Physical harm is not the only way.
Granted no child in the video got physically harmed or molested during the production, so no child was harmed in that respect. But no one can say with certainty that the children were not harmed in any other way as a result of their being taken advantage of like that.
All that line is an excuse to justify not condemning this sort of thing.
You are either on drugs or have the mental age of a 12 year old.
Or both...
There used to be laws against contributing to the delinquency of a minor, but if that law is still on the books anywhere, they’d have to arrest hundreds of thousands of public school teachers, for a start.
Now he can brag to his fellows on TrooBlewit.
Excellent comment.
Multiple lightning strike image.
That doesn't mean that someone didn't copy it and have it somewhere. Once it's out, it's out.
Nobody is interested in hearing that nonsense you're peddling and and nobody is believing it.
Do that to one of my kids and you’ll pray to be put in jail just to be safe from me.
The reason we know about this is the parents were complaining is my understanding of this. they sign a release, they get paid, they aren’t complaining. if it was the Hollywood AntiChristians doing it, they’re actors, and it’s a different story.
Filthy and sexually explicit lyrics aren’t the same as pornograhy.
I’m not recommending you view the clip, but you kinda have to to call it pornography.
You just feel like calling things pornography, but it doesn’t work like that.
So according to your morally demented mind, it would be fine if the kids were paid.
The parents were obviously not complaining because they didn’t get offered money or a release. Are you on drugs right now?
I just don’t want the small handful of people who are conservative on some but not other matters to reflect badly on normal conservatives, because I want the Conservative Republicans to win.
What a filthy thing to accuse the victims and their parents of. Not everyone is willing to sell their children into the sex trade.
Nonsense. Words can be porn, doesn’t have to be pictures. Ever heard of a pornographic book? And this video consisted of words and images.
I swear you are on drugs and have taken so many of them for so long you cannot think rationally. Your moral blindness is killing you.
That’s a lie. If you were conservative in reality, you wouldn’t be supporting selling children into the sex trade.
You are not conservative, not normal and probably not a Republican.
How did the kids hear that they were on a youtube clip. I’d never heard of this clip before but I don’t watch too much you tube.
If this clip (like any clip) used bad language it should’ve been in a section where young children couldn’t have seen it.
You’re possibly pointing out a youtube problem, where little kids are able to see clips they shouldn’t.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.