This Holdren is a real class act (not), people disagreeing with him or his view are heretics. He sounds a lot like his boss.
1 posted on
02/18/2011 11:09:54 AM PST by
jazusamo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: jazusamo
I know John Holdren.
He is a committed collectivist and statist.
Everything he says and does is intended to centralize power and lessen the ability of ordinary individuals to govern their own lives.
To: jazusamo
Heretics? So was Galileo.
(And that just got me humming "Bohemian Rhapsody" as a reminder of the New Castrati's falsetto whining, of which Holdren is a prime example.)
56 posted on
02/18/2011 1:13:12 PM PST by
rfp1234
(Le Parti du The'. Ne marchez pas sur moi!)
To: jazusamo
There are always skeptics, there are always heretics.
Thats in the nature of science.
Heretics are the nature of religion, not science.
60 posted on
02/18/2011 1:22:42 PM PST by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: jazusamo
I looked up heretic. It’s “a person believing in or practicing religious heresy.”
The man is right. He’s right because Manmade Global Warming is a religion, not a scientific theory. Heretic is the right word. I’m an MGW heretic!
65 posted on
02/18/2011 2:08:01 PM PST by
RoadTest
(Organized religion is no substitute for the relationship the living God wants with you.)
To: jazusamo
White House Science Advisor: Climate Change Skeptics Are HereticsAnd Johnny Holdren is a LUNATIC.....
.....BTW, doesn't calling a skeptic a "heretic" ADMIT "human caused climate change" belief is a RELIGION?
69 posted on
02/18/2011 5:06:33 PM PST by
SteamShovel
("Does the noise in my head bother you?")
To: jazusamo
These fools have to be stopped, simple as that. They’re talking about creating a dark age for the sake of junk science.
To: jazusamo; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ...
To: jazusamo
He didn’t address his previous statements, AGW could be false, it is believed to be true, but if it does exist it can only theoretically be measured in computer models.
79 posted on
02/18/2011 11:25:57 PM PST by
dila813
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson