Skip to comments.
Is a San Francisco politician right for not saying the Pledge of Allegiance?
Examiner ^
| 01/27/11
| Ed Walsh
Posted on 02/12/2011 10:07:29 AM PST by freespirited
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Radical chic, San Fran-style.
To: freespirited
I think I am very loyal the country. Ive expressed my patriotism through my years of doing organizing work, being a civil-rights lawyer and being a public servant now. By her logic Hussein is also loyal to this country, too bad he's constantly proving otherwise.
2
posted on
02/12/2011 10:11:03 AM PST
by
YankeeReb
To: freespirited
Now if only the American corporations that are exporting jobs would pledge Allegiance.
3
posted on
02/12/2011 10:13:52 AM PST
by
ex-snook
("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory")
There's nothing right about it. How does she even have that position in Government?
Oh, that's right - it's San Francisco. In San Fran (old days) she never would have been elected,
and if she refused to recite the Pledge, she would have been removed from the Board. More here on FR from an earlier discussion.
4
posted on
02/12/2011 10:15:46 AM PST
by
NoRedTape
To: freespirited
Well, she is correct. If you’re not protected by political correctness, you have no reasonable expectation of receiving justice.
5
posted on
02/12/2011 10:17:22 AM PST
by
Jonty30
To: freespirited
This bitch is going to do great under Sharia law. First off she’ll have to have a clitorectomy! Then the burhka! Then never be seen in public, no driver’s license! And woe be the day when she fornicates. That’s when she’ll lose her head! O yeah, she’s gonna do great!
6
posted on
02/12/2011 10:20:43 AM PST
by
Doc Savage
("I've shot people I like a lot more,...for a lot less!" Raylan Givins)
To: Doc Savage
I think I am very loyal the country. Ive expressed my patriotism through my years of doing organizing work, being a civil-rights lawyer and being a public servant now.
By her own words she states that she is an America hating COMMIE.
To: freespirited
Jane is a self-important prat. She’s just attention whoring.
8
posted on
02/12/2011 10:28:03 AM PST
by
Psycho_Bunny
(Hail To The Fail-In-Chief)
To: freespirited
I wonder how her ancesters felt about the US. I mean those who fled from Korea or China to get here.
Would be interesting to talk to her grandmother.
9
posted on
02/12/2011 10:37:35 AM PST
by
Venturer
To: ex-snook
American corporations’ first allegiance is to their owners.
10
posted on
02/12/2011 10:39:44 AM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
(Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
To: freespirited
She represents her district perfectly.
11
posted on
02/12/2011 10:41:57 AM PST
by
Carley
(ARAB STREET NO DIFFERENT THAN AMERICA'S LEFT)
To: freespirited
Well, I’m sure it will be very popular in present day San Fran.
She’s certainly wrong on the merits. “With liberty and justice for all” is the ideal toward which we should always aim. Sure, we fall short, but we should remind ourselves of the ideal.
The truth is, she probably doesn’t believe in that ideal. Her vision is more likely: “With liberty and justice for certified minorities, and not for you damned white heterosexual males! You guys go to the bottom of the ladder!”
12
posted on
02/12/2011 10:45:47 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: freespirited
13
posted on
02/12/2011 10:46:15 AM PST
by
wku man
(Still holding my breath, but exhaling a bit after Nov. 2...)
To: Balding_Eagle
"American corporations first allegiance is to their owners."If their first allegiance is not to this country, then they shouldn't be permitted to finance candidates. We are in competition with the world militarily and economically and don't need fence sitters.
14
posted on
02/12/2011 10:50:19 AM PST
by
ex-snook
("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory")
To: ex-snook
If their first allegiance is not to this country, then they shouldn’t be permitted to finance candidates.
Exactly. What percent of ownership that is hostile to America does a corporation have to have to lose their privilege of making political contributions?
15
posted on
02/12/2011 10:59:56 AM PST
by
freedomfiter2
(Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
To: freespirited
As noted by a previous poster...already discussed previously.
=8-)
To: freespirited
“civil rights lawyer” No further explantion necessary!
To: freespirited
Not this again. If she wants to live in a country she really favors; then she should go.
18
posted on
02/12/2011 11:14:38 AM PST
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: freespirited
But can we really be that surprised about someone from SF?
To: freespirited
An idiot representing other idiots.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson