The Real 'Birther' Conspiracy Theory

The American Thinker ^ | February 11, 2011 | Jack Cashill

[Scanian]

Yes and “tea baggers” think that the government is too big and taxes and spends too much, right? /s

I’m tired of putting up with vulgar slurs coming from rat bastard leftwing bloggers.

Screw’em. I refuse to be a punching bag for them.

I am a documenter and a tea partier and if I am touchy about it, I have good reason-—not just identity politics like the touchy types on the left.

[Scanian]

You want to be a masochist for the left?

Go right ahead. Be like 21st Century blacks who take no offence in “negro.”

We are being smeared. I won’t stand for it personally but if you want to-—have at it!

[FreeAtlanta]

I understand your point, but I still can't find offense in it. It bothered me at first, but that quickly passed. I think it bothered me only because I was so frustrated that people wouldn't just demand Obama's papers. (bc, college transcripts, aid forms, etc.) The "tea baggers" term does offend me because it is disgusting and anyone who would use it is a low life. The term "negro" isn't bad, it is the term "nig..." that was the derogatory. Spanish for black is negra. We need something catchy to penetrate the media and masses and get through "the Big Lie".

[Scanian]

“Negro” has Jim Crow overtones.

“Birther” is letting lefties question your mental competence.

I’m glad you at least see the tea bagger point.

[Tex-Con-Man]

“TeaBagger” had a specific Urban dictionary definition when giggling Anderson Cooper started using it as a pejorative to describe Tea Partiers.

But birther = negro? Seriously? You wanna be called Documenter-American now?

[bluecat6]

Finally a very well written article that articulates the different between an

1. Conspiracy of execution

and

2. Conspiracy of concealment

These two branches of conspiracies are rarely separated as done in this article.

And the article correct points out. #1 is rare, #2 is much more common.

I am disappointed that the article does not reference the greatest American conspiracy of all - The Watergate break-in cover-up.

And they forget that even men would likely be considered ‘good’ men and not involved with conspiracy chose to disregard direct, credible information when it was brought to them. Few remember Richard Kleindienst. After 5 days on the job and taking over from his former boss (who was part of the conspiracy) he was approached by Gordin Liddy and DIRECTLY TOLD - THE BURGLARS WERE FUNDED AND SUPPORTED BY THE COMMITTEE TO REELECT THE PRESIDENT (i.e. CREEP). Liddy wanted him to release the burglars and sweep the whole thing under the rug. Mr. Kleindienst did not do that and for that he seems to be one of the ‘good guys’ in the Watergate era. But he also DID NOT REPORT THAT LIDDY TOLD HIM DIRECTLY THAT THE BURGLARS WERE TIED TO THE WHITE HOUSE. Had he done that - we like would never had heard of Woodward or Bernstein and Nixon would have been forced from office a year or more earlier.

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/USAwatergate.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Kleindienst

So ask this - How many Kleindiensts are there in the Obama administration? Or in Hawaii?

Look at the Okubo and Fukino statements. “The records show...” or “The records indicate....”. Active conspirators or Kleindienst-like actors. Look at the lack of standard eligibility language in Hawaii O-CON submitted by Brian Schatz. Is he an active conspirator or another Kleindienst-like player here who avoided making a sworn statement that he knew was not true?

In 1972 the AG of the United States of America was told directly of the White House involvement with Watergate by a credible source. And yet it still took 2 years for this shameful period to come out.

How many parallels exist between now and 1974?

[expatguy]

He is correct.

Barack Obama's birth certificate does not exist.

An American Expat in Southeast Asia